Victims unknown: An evaluation of the way Louisville, Kentucky communicated about AIDS at the end of the 20th century

This is thesis examines the way that printed news sources reported on AIDS during the height of the epidemic in Louisville, Kentucky. It compares between mainstream and grass-roots sources to work to identify shortcomings in reporting, and how reporting on a public health crisis can be improved upon in the future. It uses an intersectional framework to deconstruct why certain news sources reported on specific demographics of the population, across racialized and gendered lines. Chapter One analyzes the epidemic and then contextualizes the language that was used. Chapter Two focuses on mainstream local newspapers, while also defining demographics of AIDS patients. Chapter Three details the reporting of student newspapers, deconstructing the role of religious homophobia within AIDS reporting. Chapter Four focuses on a grass-roots queer newsletter and how it catered towards Louisville’s gay community. Chapter Five summarizes the shortcomings among sources and suggests ways to improve public health reporting.

Publication Details

Journal
ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Victims unknown: An evaluation of the way Louisville, Kentucky communicated about AIDS at the end of the 20th century

ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Victims unknown: An evaluation of the way Louisville, Kentucky communicated about AIDS at the end of the 20th century

article en

Abstract

This is thesis examines the way that printed news sources reported on AIDS during the height of the epidemic in Louisville, Kentucky. It compares between mainstream and grass-roots sources to work to identify shortcomings in reporting, and how reporting on a public health crisis can be improved upon in the future. It uses an intersectional framework to deconstruct why certain news sources reported on specific demographics of the population, across racialized and gendered lines. Chapter One analyzes the epidemic and then contextualizes the language that was used. Chapter Two focuses on mainstream local newspapers, while also defining demographics of AIDS patients. Chapter Three details the reporting of student newspapers, deconstructing the role of religious homophobia within AIDS reporting. Chapter Four focuses on a grass-roots queer newsletter and how it catered towards Louisville’s gay community. Chapter Five summarizes the shortcomings among sources and suggests ways to improve public health reporting.

ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.