User Resistance Towards Artificial Intelligence: A Study Focusing on AI-Hallucinations and Ethics

Although artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as ChatGPT offer transformational potential for knowledge work, user resistance to their adoption remains substantial. Existing research has largely attributed this resistance to concerns about accuracy, trust, and job displacement, but has overlooked AI-specific phenomena such as hallucinations and ethical concerns. We address this gap by developing a research model based on user resistance literature, which integrates two contextualized perspectives: (1) AI-hallucinations and (2) ethics. Grounded using a quantitative survey with 185 users familiar with AI systems, we found that ethics-related factors, particularly perceived threats and moral obligations, drive user resistance, whereas hallucination-related concerns have limited explanatory power. Contrary to our assumption, users with higher critical thinking show lower user resistance. We discuss these findings, derive implications for user resistance and AI literature, and develop directions for further research.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

User Resistance Towards Artificial Intelligence: A Study Focusing on AI-Hallucinations and Ethics

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

User Resistance Towards Artificial Intelligence: A Study Focusing on AI-Hallucinations and Ethics

article en

Abstract

Although artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as ChatGPT offer transformational potential for knowledge work, user resistance to their adoption remains substantial. Existing research has largely attributed this resistance to concerns about accuracy, trust, and job displacement, but has overlooked AI-specific phenomena such as hallucinations and ethical concerns. We address this gap by developing a research model based on user resistance literature, which integrates two contextualized perspectives: (1) AI-hallucinations and (2) ethics. Grounded using a quantitative survey with 185 users familiar with AI systems, we found that ethics-related factors, particularly perceived threats and moral obligations, drive user resistance, whereas hallucination-related concerns have limited explanatory power. Contrary to our assumption, users with higher critical thinking show lower user resistance. We discuss these findings, derive implications for user resistance and AI literature, and develop directions for further research.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
University of Bamberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

User Resistance Towards Artificial Intelligence: A Study Focusing on AI-Hallucinations and Ethics · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS