Sufficient vs. Necessary: Building Trust in AI through Transparency

Organizations increasingly use AI-based systems to enhance decision-making quality and efficiency. To ensure their acceptance, these systems must be trusted, which is challenging due to their black-box nature. This study tackles this issue by investigating transparency’s role in building trust in AI-based systems within organizational settings. To ensure generalizability, we collected quantitative data (N = 978) across two scenarios differing in their degree of process automation (automated vs. augmented). Using structural equation modeling and necessary condition analysis, we analyzed the effect of a multidimensional conceptualization of transparency on trust. Our results demonstrate that the individual transparency dimensions not only positively affect trust but are also indispensable for its formation. Without specific minimum levels of these transparency dimensions, establishing trust in AI-based systems is fundamentally unachievable. This study advances the AI adoption literature by exploring the transparency-trust relationship from both sufficiency and necessity perspectives, thus guiding strategic AI implementation in organizations.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sufficient vs. Necessary: Building Trust in AI through Transparency

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Sufficient vs. Necessary: Building Trust in AI through Transparency

article en

Abstract

Organizations increasingly use AI-based systems to enhance decision-making quality and efficiency. To ensure their acceptance, these systems must be trusted, which is challenging due to their black-box nature. This study tackles this issue by investigating transparency’s role in building trust in AI-based systems within organizational settings. To ensure generalizability, we collected quantitative data (N = 978) across two scenarios differing in their degree of process automation (automated vs. augmented). Using structural equation modeling and necessary condition analysis, we analyzed the effect of a multidimensional conceptualization of transparency on trust. Our results demonstrate that the individual transparency dimensions not only positively affect trust but are also indispensable for its formation. Without specific minimum levels of these transparency dimensions, establishing trust in AI-based systems is fundamentally unachievable. This study advances the AI adoption literature by exploring the transparency-trust relationship from both sufficiency and necessity perspectives, thus guiding strategic AI implementation in organizations.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.