Self-Reported Access to Oral Health Care and Perception of Oral Health from 2011-2020

An individual’s perception of their oral cavity directly correlates with whether he/she will seek oral health care. Self-reported oral health (SROH) rating is typically measured on a scale of excellent to poor and is a validated measure of an individual’s oral health. This study aimed to (1) examine the correlation between SROH and access to oral health care, (2) assess changes in access and SROH from 2011 to 2020, and (3) analyze variations across age, gender, and race. Data was collected from the 2011-12, 2013-14, 2015-16, and 2017-20 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for individuals 20 or older. Two questions for the Oral Health Questionnaire were used: (1) rate the health of teeth and gums and (2) whether oral health care was available in the past 12 months when needed. Demographic data was collected. Data was uploaded to RStudio and analyzed for statistical significance. A significant correlation between SROH and access to care was found. No significant differences in mean SROH were observed across survey cycles (p = 0.27), and access to care did not significantly change over time (p = 0.1296). SROH varied by age, with individuals aged 30-64 reporting lower SROH and those 65+ more likely to report care access. Males reported lower SROH but higher access than females. Asian and White individuals reported higher SROH and access compared to other racial/ethnic groups. Future research should include the 2021-22 data to explore pandemic-related impacts on oral health perceptions and access and underlying factors affecting access.

Publication Details

Journal
OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)
Published
2024-12-06
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Reported Access to Oral Health Care and Perception of Oral Health from 2011-2020

OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Self-Reported Access to Oral Health Care and Perception of Oral Health from 2011-2020

article en

Abstract

An individual’s perception of their oral cavity directly correlates with whether he/she will seek oral health care. Self-reported oral health (SROH) rating is typically measured on a scale of excellent to poor and is a validated measure of an individual’s oral health. This study aimed to (1) examine the correlation between SROH and access to oral health care, (2) assess changes in access and SROH from 2011 to 2020, and (3) analyze variations across age, gender, and race. Data was collected from the 2011-12, 2013-14, 2015-16, and 2017-20 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for individuals 20 or older. Two questions for the Oral Health Questionnaire were used: (1) rate the health of teeth and gums and (2) whether oral health care was available in the past 12 months when needed. Demographic data was collected. Data was uploaded to RStudio and analyzed for statistical significance. A significant correlation between SROH and access to care was found. No significant differences in mean SROH were observed across survey cycles (p = 0.27), and access to care did not significantly change over time (p = 0.1296). SROH varied by age, with individuals aged 30-64 reporting lower SROH and those 65+ more likely to report care access. Males reported lower SROH but higher access than females. Asian and White individuals reported higher SROH and access compared to other racial/ethnic groups. Future research should include the 2021-22 data to explore pandemic-related impacts on oral health perceptions and access and underlying factors affecting access.

OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.