Psychosoziale Gruppendynamiken bei multilateralen Verhandlungen: Erfahrungen von COP28

The Conference of the Parties (COP) is the single most important multilateral forum when it comes to solving the global climate crisis. Whilst there has been intensive study into the outcomes, policies and institutional aspects, little attention has been paid to the group dynamics that occur during the intensive, annual two-week decision-making process. By using a group dynamic lens, field observations from COP28 were used to differentiate not only the different social settings in which negotiators come together, but also how these affect their ability to communicate effectively and to take decisions. Results show that whilst the negotiation process is highly structured and bureaucratic, key moments of COPs—in particular the informal parts—are often unfacilitated spaces, which make meaningful, relational and quality communication difficult. Alongside further recommendations for research, the paper concludes that strengthening the group dynamics competencies of negotiators, and especially chairing staff, should be paramount in the effort to increase trust and quality of communication during these large scale multilateral negotiations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Publication Database IASS (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS))
Published
2024-10-18
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychosoziale Gruppendynamiken bei multilateralen Verhandlungen: Erfahrungen von COP28

Publication Database IASS (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS))
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

Psychosoziale Gruppendynamiken bei multilateralen Verhandlungen: Erfahrungen von COP28

article en

Abstract

The Conference of the Parties (COP) is the single most important multilateral forum when it comes to solving the global climate crisis. Whilst there has been intensive study into the outcomes, policies and institutional aspects, little attention has been paid to the group dynamics that occur during the intensive, annual two-week decision-making process. By using a group dynamic lens, field observations from COP28 were used to differentiate not only the different social settings in which negotiators come together, but also how these affect their ability to communicate effectively and to take decisions. Results show that whilst the negotiation process is highly structured and bureaucratic, key moments of COPs—in particular the informal parts—are often unfacilitated spaces, which make meaningful, relational and quality communication difficult. Alongside further recommendations for research, the paper concludes that strengthening the group dynamics competencies of negotiators, and especially chairing staff, should be paramount in the effort to increase trust and quality of communication during these large scale multilateral negotiations.

Publication Database IASS (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS))
Japan External Trade Organization (JP), Research Institute for Sustainability at GFZ (DE), Institute for Sustainability (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.