Optimizing steel plate shear wall performance: influence of infill plate thickness and connection length to vertical boundary elements / Saidatul Assyura Rosman ... [et al.]

The Steel Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) is widely used as a lateral force resisting system in areas prone to high seismic activity. This is because of its exceptional ductility and ability to dissipate energy. Previous studies have indicated that disconnecting the infill plate from the Vertical Boundary Element (VBE) can decrease the demands on the column. The observed outcomes lead to a decline in both the energy dissipation capability and the lateral load-bearing capacity. The primary goal of this investigation is to mitigate stress on the column while concurrently reducing both the energy dissipation and lateral force capacities. To accomplish this, a partial connection will be established between the infill plate and the Vertical Boundary Element. Thus, the overarching objective of this research is to identify the optimal connection length that minimizes the demands on the column while simultaneously curtailing the reduction in energy dissipation and lateral force capacities. Using Abaqus software, twenty models with different infill plate thicknesses and lengths of connection between the infill plate and Vertical Boundary Element were analysed. To determine the optimal length of connection between the infill plate and Vertical Boundary Element, the energy dissipation capacity, lateral load capacity, and column stresses were evaluated and compared. The maximum dissipation of energy occurs at a connection length of 75% between the infill plate and Vertical Boundary Element and an infill plate thickness of 12 mm. In contrast, the greatest lateral load capacity is achieved at connection lengths of 50% between a 25 mm infill plate thickness and a Vertical Boundary Element weight of 25%. The column stress reaches its minimum value when the infill plate measures 20 and 25 mm, and it reaches its maximum value when the infill plate measures 6 mm and 12 mm. By increasing the thickness of the infill plate and minimizing its connection to the Vertical Boundary Elements, the column stress in Vertical Boundary Elements can be decreased, while simultaneously enhancing lateral load capacity and maintaining an adequate level of energy dissipation.

Publication Details

Journal
UiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)
Published
2024-09-01
Primary Topic
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing steel plate shear wall performance: influence of infill plate thickness and connection length to vertical boundary elements / Saidatul Assyura Rosman ... [et al.]

UiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
article

Optimizing steel plate shear wall performance: influence of infill plate thickness and connection length to vertical boundary elements / Saidatul Assyura Rosman ... [et al.]

article en

Abstract

The Steel Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) is widely used as a lateral force resisting system in areas prone to high seismic activity. This is because of its exceptional ductility and ability to dissipate energy. Previous studies have indicated that disconnecting the infill plate from the Vertical Boundary Element (VBE) can decrease the demands on the column. The observed outcomes lead to a decline in both the energy dissipation capability and the lateral load-bearing capacity. The primary goal of this investigation is to mitigate stress on the column while concurrently reducing both the energy dissipation and lateral force capacities. To accomplish this, a partial connection will be established between the infill plate and the Vertical Boundary Element. Thus, the overarching objective of this research is to identify the optimal connection length that minimizes the demands on the column while simultaneously curtailing the reduction in energy dissipation and lateral force capacities. Using Abaqus software, twenty models with different infill plate thicknesses and lengths of connection between the infill plate and Vertical Boundary Element were analysed. To determine the optimal length of connection between the infill plate and Vertical Boundary Element, the energy dissipation capacity, lateral load capacity, and column stresses were evaluated and compared. The maximum dissipation of energy occurs at a connection length of 75% between the infill plate and Vertical Boundary Element and an infill plate thickness of 12 mm. In contrast, the greatest lateral load capacity is achieved at connection lengths of 50% between a 25 mm infill plate thickness and a Vertical Boundary Element weight of 25%. The column stress reaches its minimum value when the infill plate measures 20 and 25 mm, and it reaches its maximum value when the infill plate measures 6 mm and 12 mm. By increasing the thickness of the infill plate and minimizing its connection to the Vertical Boundary Elements, the column stress in Vertical Boundary Elements can be decreased, while simultaneously enhancing lateral load capacity and maintaining an adequate level of energy dissipation.

UiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimizing steel plate shear wall performance: influence of infill plate thickness and connection length to vertical boundary elements / Saidatul Assyura Rosman ... [et al.] · UiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS