The Normative Porosity of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: From "Human Rights at Sea" to the "Ocean-Climate Nexus"

This article delves into the nexus between the 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS”) and the broader international legal order, focusing on UNCLOS Article 287 tribunals with jurisdiction limited to disputes related to the Convention. The study categorizes three gateways through which external rules of international law influence the interpretation and application of UNCLOS: Renvoi provisions, systemic interpretation mechanisms, and systemic integration via Article 293(1). Considering recent studies highlighting UNCLOS as a “springboard for interaction,” this research synthesizes legal dogmatics with insights from the sociology of law and international relations theory. Mindful of the momentum experienced by the “human rights at sea” and the “ocean-climate nexus” movements, it offers a comprehensive understanding of UNCLOS’s integrative limits, crucial for maintaining its delicate balance amid evolving legal complexities, especially in the context of its compulsory dispute settlement system.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-03-26
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Normative Porosity of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: From "Human Rights at Sea" to the "Ocean-Climate Nexus"

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

The Normative Porosity of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: From "Human Rights at Sea" to the "Ocean-Climate Nexus"

article en

Abstract

This article delves into the nexus between the 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS”) and the broader international legal order, focusing on UNCLOS Article 287 tribunals with jurisdiction limited to disputes related to the Convention. The study categorizes three gateways through which external rules of international law influence the interpretation and application of UNCLOS: Renvoi provisions, systemic interpretation mechanisms, and systemic integration via Article 293(1). Considering recent studies highlighting UNCLOS as a “springboard for interaction,” this research synthesizes legal dogmatics with insights from the sociology of law and international relations theory. Mindful of the momentum experienced by the “human rights at sea” and the “ocean-climate nexus” movements, it offers a comprehensive understanding of UNCLOS’s integrative limits, crucial for maintaining its delicate balance amid evolving legal complexities, especially in the context of its compulsory dispute settlement system.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.