NIL: How Third-Party Businesses Exploit Collegiate Student-Athletes with Impunity

While there are numerous state NIL (name, image, and likeness) laws protecting student-athletes from economic exploitation, there is no federal law which offers universal protection, nationwide, to student-athletes. State NIL laws offer some protections for student-athletes from exploitation by colleges, universities, and boosters, but there is no protection for student-athletes who sign NIL deals with for-profit third-party businesses. These NIL deals, between the student-athlete and third-party businesses, make up the majority of NIL agreements. Section 6 of the proposed College Athlete Economic Freedom Act (“CAEFA”), titled “Enforcement Provisions,” aims to codify federal protection for student-athletes against colleges, universities, and boosters, yet leaves student-athletes unprotected from for-profit, third-party businesses. Student-athletes, primed to fall victim to deceptive business practices by these companies by signing away their present and future NIL rights, are without recourse while third-party businesses operate with impunity. Section 6 of CAEFA should apply to third-party businesses as well as colleges, universities, and boosters because student-athletes should have universal protection against exploitation and control over their NIL rights.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NIL: How Third-Party Businesses Exploit Collegiate Student-Athletes with Impunity

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
article

NIL: How Third-Party Businesses Exploit Collegiate Student-Athletes with Impunity

article en

Abstract

While there are numerous state NIL (name, image, and likeness) laws protecting student-athletes from economic exploitation, there is no federal law which offers universal protection, nationwide, to student-athletes. State NIL laws offer some protections for student-athletes from exploitation by colleges, universities, and boosters, but there is no protection for student-athletes who sign NIL deals with for-profit third-party businesses. These NIL deals, between the student-athlete and third-party businesses, make up the majority of NIL agreements. Section 6 of the proposed College Athlete Economic Freedom Act (“CAEFA”), titled “Enforcement Provisions,” aims to codify federal protection for student-athletes against colleges, universities, and boosters, yet leaves student-athletes unprotected from for-profit, third-party businesses. Student-athletes, primed to fall victim to deceptive business practices by these companies by signing away their present and future NIL rights, are without recourse while third-party businesses operate with impunity. Section 6 of CAEFA should apply to third-party businesses as well as colleges, universities, and boosters because student-athletes should have universal protection against exploitation and control over their NIL rights.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

NIL: How Third-Party Businesses Exploit Collegiate Student-Athletes with Impunity · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS