A Matter of Public Concern: Eliminating the Public Concern Test to Safeguard <i>New York Times Co. v. Sullivan<i>

In recent years, Justices Thomas and Gorsuch have expressed a strong interest in reconsidering, and perhaps overruling, the landmark defamation decision, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. The Court’s defamation jurisprudence has undergone many changes since the landmark case was decided, namely, the Court has since adopted a test known as the “public concern” test. Though adopted by only a plurality of the Court, the “public concern” test has been integrated into the defamation decisions of lower federal courts and state courts. This comment encourages the Court to abandon any push toward the wholesale abandonment of Sullivan and, instead, advocates for an abandonment of the “public concern” test on the basis that such a test cannot be defined with sufficient clarity and does little to honor the underpinnings of the Court’s decision in Sullivan.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-04-08
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Matter of Public Concern: Eliminating the Public Concern Test to Safeguard New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

A Matter of Public Concern: Eliminating the Public Concern Test to Safeguard New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

article en

Abstract

In recent years, Justices Thomas and Gorsuch have expressed a strong interest in reconsidering, and perhaps overruling, the landmark defamation decision, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. The Court’s defamation jurisprudence has undergone many changes since the landmark case was decided, namely, the Court has since adopted a test known as the “public concern” test. Though adopted by only a plurality of the Court, the “public concern” test has been integrated into the defamation decisions of lower federal courts and state courts. This comment encourages the Court to abandon any push toward the wholesale abandonment of Sullivan and, instead, advocates for an abandonment of the “public concern” test on the basis that such a test cannot be defined with sufficient clarity and does little to honor the underpinnings of the Court’s decision in Sullivan.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Matter of Public Concern: Eliminating the Public Concern Test to Safeguard <i>New York Times Co. v. Sullivan<i> · eYLS (Yale Law School) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS