<em>No Conozco a Ninguna Miranda y Quiero Mi Abogado:</em> The Constitutional Inadequacies of Translated <em>“Miranda Cards”</em> in Police Interrogations

This article explores the challenges and complexities surrounding the application of the Miranda warning in the United States and specifically addresses its impact on non– English–speaking immigrants. While many Americans are familiar with these rights, recent immigrants may not fully understand them, particularly if they come from countries that do not offer equivalent legal protections. This article performs a comparative analysis of the right to silence and counsel in Cuba, Haiti, and Colombia—three countries with the largest immigrant populations in Miami, FL. Furthermore, this article examines how Miami-Dade Police address the linguistic barriers inherent in translated “Miranda Cards,” and argues that these cards alone are insufficient in ensuring a “knowing, intelligent, and voluntary” waiver. This article concludes by proposing more effective strategies to ensure non–English–speaking individuals understand their rights and that their waivers meet constitutional muster.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-11-26
Primary Topic
World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No Conozco a Ninguna Miranda y Quiero Mi Abogado: The Constitutional Inadequacies of Translated “Miranda Cards” in Police Interrogations

eYLS (Yale Law School)
World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
article

No Conozco a Ninguna Miranda y Quiero Mi Abogado: The Constitutional Inadequacies of Translated “Miranda Cards” in Police Interrogations

article en

Abstract

This article explores the challenges and complexities surrounding the application of the Miranda warning in the United States and specifically addresses its impact on non– English–speaking immigrants. While many Americans are familiar with these rights, recent immigrants may not fully understand them, particularly if they come from countries that do not offer equivalent legal protections. This article performs a comparative analysis of the right to silence and counsel in Cuba, Haiti, and Colombia—three countries with the largest immigrant populations in Miami, FL. Furthermore, this article examines how Miami-Dade Police address the linguistic barriers inherent in translated “Miranda Cards,” and argues that these cards alone are insufficient in ensuring a “knowing, intelligent, and voluntary” waiver. This article concludes by proposing more effective strategies to ensure non–English–speaking individuals understand their rights and that their waivers meet constitutional muster.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.