LGBT+ Welfare and Assets in Great Britain

This project aimed to understand the experiences of LGBT+ people when they access social security benefits. We use LGBT+ as an umbrella term to describe all people who are not heterosexual and/or not cisgender. This mixed-methods research used secondary analysis of survey datasets that are designed to be representative of the population of Great Britain, and qualitative interviews with 114 LGBT+ people who had claimed social security benefits within the last decade, or that had specific experiences of accumulating wealth over the life-course. The surveys used were the Family Resources Survey ([FRS], most results based on a sample of 68,757 individuals recorded between 2016-21), the Wealth and Assets Survey ([WAS] 42,355 individuals, 2014-20), and the UK Household Longitudinal Study ([UKHLS] c.48,000 individuals, 2011-20). These surveys record sexual identity in terms of whether someone is bisexual, homosexual, or heterosexual, allowing comparisons between LGB and non-LGB respondents. The LGBT+ population is demographically quite different from the wider population, in ways that are closely associated with many of the outcomes and experiences we are interested in. In statistical analyses of the survey data, we used regression modelling to try to control for these differences.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Published
2024-12-31
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LGBT+ Welfare and Assets in Great Britain

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

LGBT+ Welfare and Assets in Great Britain

article en

Abstract

This project aimed to understand the experiences of LGBT+ people when they access social security benefits. We use LGBT+ as an umbrella term to describe all people who are not heterosexual and/or not cisgender. This mixed-methods research used secondary analysis of survey datasets that are designed to be representative of the population of Great Britain, and qualitative interviews with 114 LGBT+ people who had claimed social security benefits within the last decade, or that had specific experiences of accumulating wealth over the life-course. The surveys used were the Family Resources Survey ([FRS], most results based on a sample of 68,757 individuals recorded between 2016-21), the Wealth and Assets Survey ([WAS] 42,355 individuals, 2014-20), and the UK Household Longitudinal Study ([UKHLS] c.48,000 individuals, 2011-20). These surveys record sexual identity in terms of whether someone is bisexual, homosexual, or heterosexual, allowing comparisons between LGB and non-LGB respondents. The LGBT+ population is demographically quite different from the wider population, in ways that are closely associated with many of the outcomes and experiences we are interested in. In statistical analyses of the survey data, we used regression modelling to try to control for these differences.

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
University of Stirling (GB)
Government of the United Kingdom, Nuffield Foundation
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.