Large Language Models as Annotators of Named Entities in Climate Change and Biodiversity: A Preliminary Study

This paper examines whether few-shot techniques for Named Entity Recognition (NER) utilising existing large language models (LLMs) as their backbone can be used to reliably annotate named entities (NEs) in scientific texts on climate change and biodiversity. A series of experiments aim to assess whether LLMs can be integrated into an end-to-end pipeline that could generate token- or sentence-level NE annotations; the former being an ideal-case scenario that allows for seamless integration of existing with new token-level features in a single annotation pipeline. Experiments are run on four LLMs, two NER datasets, two input and output data formats, and ten and nine prompt versions per dataset. The results show that few-shot methods are far from being a silver bullet for NER in highly specialised domains, although improvement in LLM performance is observed for some prompt designs and some NE classes. Few-shot methods would find better use in a human-in-the-loop scenario, where an LLM's output is verified by a domain expert.

Publication Details

Journal
DSpace repository (University of Tartu)
Published
2025-02-17
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Language Models as Annotators of Named Entities in Climate Change and Biodiversity: A Preliminary Study

1 citations
DSpace repository (University of Tartu)
Topic Modeling
2.48
article

Large Language Models as Annotators of Named Entities in Climate Change and Biodiversity: A Preliminary Study

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines whether few-shot techniques for Named Entity Recognition (NER) utilising existing large language models (LLMs) as their backbone can be used to reliably annotate named entities (NEs) in scientific texts on climate change and biodiversity. A series of experiments aim to assess whether LLMs can be integrated into an end-to-end pipeline that could generate token- or sentence-level NE annotations; the former being an ideal-case scenario that allows for seamless integration of existing with new token-level features in a single annotation pipeline. Experiments are run on four LLMs, two NER datasets, two input and output data formats, and ten and nine prompt versions per dataset. The results show that few-shot methods are far from being a silver bullet for NER in highly specialised domains, although improvement in LLM performance is observed for some prompt designs and some NE classes. Few-shot methods would find better use in a human-in-the-loop scenario, where an LLM's output is verified by a domain expert.

DSpace repository (University of Tartu)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Topic Modeling
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.