Interpersonal Processes in Human-AI Teams: Toward an Updated Framework for Team Processes

This paper explores the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into workplace teams and its influence on interpersonal dynamics. Drawing on Marks et al.'s (2001) team processes framework, we examine how AI influences interpersonal processes like conflict management, motivation, and affect management. Findings suggest that while AI can enhance objectivity, motivation, and efficiency, it may also introduce new tensions and anxieties about job security. We critically analyze both the opportunities and risks associated with AI integration, including the role of trust and individual perceptions. To address gaps in existing research, we outline a qualitative research agenda exploring the nature and distribution of interpersonal processes in human-AI teams. Preliminary interviews reveal that AI has strong motivational potential, though emotional responses vary, with some team members expressing fears and differing adaptation speeds.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpersonal Processes in Human-AI Teams: Toward an Updated Framework for Team Processes

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
article

Interpersonal Processes in Human-AI Teams: Toward an Updated Framework for Team Processes

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into workplace teams and its influence on interpersonal dynamics. Drawing on Marks et al.'s (2001) team processes framework, we examine how AI influences interpersonal processes like conflict management, motivation, and affect management. Findings suggest that while AI can enhance objectivity, motivation, and efficiency, it may also introduce new tensions and anxieties about job security. We critically analyze both the opportunities and risks associated with AI integration, including the role of trust and individual perceptions. To address gaps in existing research, we outline a qualitative research agenda exploring the nature and distribution of interpersonal processes in human-AI teams. Preliminary interviews reveal that AI has strong motivational potential, though emotional responses vary, with some team members expressing fears and differing adaptation speeds.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.