Inadequacy of Peak Detachment Force in Describing Ice Adhesion Strength: the Critical Role of Shear Force-Time Evolution in Icephobicity Assessment

Icephobicity encompasses a multifaceted definition that necessitates evaluations across various scales, from single droplets to larger ice specimens. The predominant method for evaluating icephobicity performance is ice adhesion strength (IAS) testing. Multiple geometries and scales for ice adhesion testing are proposed. The conventional key parameter derived from this test for icephobicity analysis is the peak detachment force value, which is subsequently converted to IAS (stress). Recent studies raise questions regarding this approach and challenge its adequacy for a comprehensive icephobicity assessment. To achieve a more profound understanding of the phenomena involved, this study utilizes three distinct ice adhesion test benches, all in horizontal shear geometry but under varying scales and conditions. The findings indicate that the peak force values derived from ice adhesion testing do not necessarily reflect the actual icephobicity behavior. However, force versus time evolution (obtained from force–time plots) can provide valuable insights into icephobicity, including the viscoelastic response of coatings and the underlying failure mechanisms. The beneficial aspects of force time evolution are additionally validated in the context of investigating coating durability through consecutive ice adhesion (icing/ice detachment) cycles, wherein conventional methodologies, such as wetting and morphological parameters, fail to capture the actual coating deterioration.

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
American History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inadequacy of Peak Detachment Force in Describing Ice Adhesion Strength: the Critical Role of Shear Force-Time Evolution in Icephobicity Assessment

UCL Discovery (University College London)
American History and Culture
article

Inadequacy of Peak Detachment Force in Describing Ice Adhesion Strength: the Critical Role of Shear Force-Time Evolution in Icephobicity Assessment

article en

Abstract

Icephobicity encompasses a multifaceted definition that necessitates evaluations across various scales, from single droplets to larger ice specimens. The predominant method for evaluating icephobicity performance is ice adhesion strength (IAS) testing. Multiple geometries and scales for ice adhesion testing are proposed. The conventional key parameter derived from this test for icephobicity analysis is the peak detachment force value, which is subsequently converted to IAS (stress). Recent studies raise questions regarding this approach and challenge its adequacy for a comprehensive icephobicity assessment. To achieve a more profound understanding of the phenomena involved, this study utilizes three distinct ice adhesion test benches, all in horizontal shear geometry but under varying scales and conditions. The findings indicate that the peak force values derived from ice adhesion testing do not necessarily reflect the actual icephobicity behavior. However, force versus time evolution (obtained from force–time plots) can provide valuable insights into icephobicity, including the viscoelastic response of coatings and the underlying failure mechanisms. The beneficial aspects of force time evolution are additionally validated in the context of investigating coating durability through consecutive ice adhesion (icing/ice detachment) cycles, wherein conventional methodologies, such as wetting and morphological parameters, fail to capture the actual coating deterioration.

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
American History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.