Identifying Causal and Contextual Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Distance Education

Objective: The primary aim of the current research endeavor was to discern the determinants influencing the efficacy of distance education Methods: In this investigation, a qualitative methodological approach was employed. The sampling within the qualitative component was executed intentionally through the expert network methodology, wherein 13 individuals contributed to the interview process. To evaluate the variables pertinent to the research, a semi-structured interview format was utilized to examine the factors influencing the assessment of the efficacy of distance education. The agreement coefficient of 0.78 obtained from the interviews signifies a high level of reliability associated with the research instruments employed. The analysis of qualitative data was conducted utilizing open, selective, and theoretical coding techniques. Results: The conclusive findings of the study, as derived from the interviews, revealed that the determinants influencing the assessment of the efficacy of distance education include: 1) Causal factors (modern technology; perceived ease of use; suitable educational software; qualified instructors; learner motivation and engagement); 2) Contextual factors (legislative frameworks and regulations, adequate technological infrastructure, support mechanisms for distance learning, proficiency in information technology, and the diversity and applicability of educational content). Conclusions: Findings support the role of contextual and causal factors in the effectiveness of distance learning.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Causal and Contextual Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Distance Education

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

Identifying Causal and Contextual Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Distance Education

article en

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of the current research endeavor was to discern the determinants influencing the efficacy of distance education Methods: In this investigation, a qualitative methodological approach was employed. The sampling within the qualitative component was executed intentionally through the expert network methodology, wherein 13 individuals contributed to the interview process. To evaluate the variables pertinent to the research, a semi-structured interview format was utilized to examine the factors influencing the assessment of the efficacy of distance education. The agreement coefficient of 0.78 obtained from the interviews signifies a high level of reliability associated with the research instruments employed. The analysis of qualitative data was conducted utilizing open, selective, and theoretical coding techniques. Results: The conclusive findings of the study, as derived from the interviews, revealed that the determinants influencing the assessment of the efficacy of distance education include: 1) Causal factors (modern technology; perceived ease of use; suitable educational software; qualified instructors; learner motivation and engagement); 2) Contextual factors (legislative frameworks and regulations, adequate technological infrastructure, support mechanisms for distance learning, proficiency in information technology, and the diversity and applicability of educational content). Conclusions: Findings support the role of contextual and causal factors in the effectiveness of distance learning.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Islamic Azad University North Tehran Branch (IR), Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht (IR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.