Fentanyl, Narco-Terrorism, and National Security Politics

This Article examines the use of a counterterrorism model to attack the fentanyl crisis. Rather than advocate for or against such a model, this Article envisions what employing a counterterrorism model against international drug traffickers would look like. Noting the dimensions of national security politics that intersect with counter-fentanyl policy, this Article will evaluate three distinct counterterrorism approaches: (1) using criminal counterterrorism statutes in federal indictments and prosecutions; (2) designating drug trafficking organizations as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs); and (3) authorizing the use of military force against Mexican cartels. While the current state of bellicose national security politics can inform and strengthen legal strategies for countering fentanyl trafficking, it can also obscure the problem’s complexity. This Article therefore recognizes the challenges to, but also seeks to reconcile, the relationship between counterterrorism law and national security politics in the fight against fentanyl.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital USD (University of San Diego)
Published
2024-12-30
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fentanyl, Narco-Terrorism, and National Security Politics

Digital USD (University of San Diego)
Japanese History and Culture
article

Fentanyl, Narco-Terrorism, and National Security Politics

article en

Abstract

This Article examines the use of a counterterrorism model to attack the fentanyl crisis. Rather than advocate for or against such a model, this Article envisions what employing a counterterrorism model against international drug traffickers would look like. Noting the dimensions of national security politics that intersect with counter-fentanyl policy, this Article will evaluate three distinct counterterrorism approaches: (1) using criminal counterterrorism statutes in federal indictments and prosecutions; (2) designating drug trafficking organizations as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs); and (3) authorizing the use of military force against Mexican cartels. While the current state of bellicose national security politics can inform and strengthen legal strategies for countering fentanyl trafficking, it can also obscure the problem’s complexity. This Article therefore recognizes the challenges to, but also seeks to reconcile, the relationship between counterterrorism law and national security politics in the fight against fentanyl.

Digital USD (University of San Diego)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.