Explainable DC optimal power flow decisions

This paper introduces a framework for explaining the solutions to instances of the DC Optimal Power Flow problem by deriving counterfactual explanations (CEs). We aim to answer questions such as “Why was this generator not dispatched?” by identifying the minimum change in input parameters, specifically the nodal demands. This allows the user to identify the most important difference between the real and expected market outcomes and observe which constraints have led to the solution. The framework uses a bilevel optimisation problem to find the counterfactual scenario. State-of-the-art methods are compared with data-driven heuristics on the basis of computational feasibility and CE accuracy. We find that, by simply querying a dataset of previous solutions to obtain candidates for possible sets of active constraints, we can derive CEs for problems that would be intractable using conventional methods. The research addresses the need for more transparent decision-making in electricity markets, particularly regarding economic dispatch decisions, which are becoming increasingly difficult to comprehend due to the complexities of modern power system optimisation problems.

Publication Details

Journal
Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
Published
2025-05-05
Primary Topic
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable DC optimal power flow decisions

Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
article

Explainable DC optimal power flow decisions

article en

Abstract

This paper introduces a framework for explaining the solutions to instances of the DC Optimal Power Flow problem by deriving counterfactual explanations (CEs). We aim to answer questions such as “Why was this generator not dispatched?” by identifying the minimum change in input parameters, specifically the nodal demands. This allows the user to identify the most important difference between the real and expected market outcomes and observe which constraints have led to the solution. The framework uses a bilevel optimisation problem to find the counterfactual scenario. State-of-the-art methods are compared with data-driven heuristics on the basis of computational feasibility and CE accuracy. We find that, by simply querying a dataset of previous solutions to obtain candidates for possible sets of active constraints, we can derive CEs for problems that would be intractable using conventional methods. The research addresses the need for more transparent decision-making in electricity markets, particularly regarding economic dispatch decisions, which are becoming increasingly difficult to comprehend due to the complexities of modern power system optimisation problems.

Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Explainable DC optimal power flow decisions · Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS