Flight Performance Of Multi-rotor Configuration Tail Rotors

To better understand and predict the flight performance of multi-rotor configurations of tail rotors controlled via collective pitch or rotor speed, a flight performance tool is derived. The tool includes a tail rotor model, an aerodynamic interference model, and a trim method. The vertical configuration of a multi-rotor tail rotor can effectively take advantage of aerodynamic interference to reduce the required power. The five-rotor configuration with fixed rotor speed reduces the power by 36.7%. More rotors are preferable from the point of view of power consumption. Too many rotors are unnecessary, since the extra benefit obtained is very diminished. Varying the rotor speed is better for performance improvement compared with varying the collective pitch, since lower rotor speed leads to rotor power reduction. The five-rotor configuration with fixed collective pitch reduces the power by 53.3%. The severe aerodynamic interference between the rotors leads to the longitudinal configuration of multi-rotor configuration having much poorer performance. The four-rotor configuration in a “plus” arrangement achieves better performance than the cross four-rotor configuration or a vertical four-rotor configuration.

Publication Details

Journal
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Legal Cases and Commentary
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flight Performance Of Multi-rotor Configuration Tail Rotors

ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
Legal Cases and Commentary
article

Flight Performance Of Multi-rotor Configuration Tail Rotors

article en

Abstract

To better understand and predict the flight performance of multi-rotor configurations of tail rotors controlled via collective pitch or rotor speed, a flight performance tool is derived. The tool includes a tail rotor model, an aerodynamic interference model, and a trim method. The vertical configuration of a multi-rotor tail rotor can effectively take advantage of aerodynamic interference to reduce the required power. The five-rotor configuration with fixed rotor speed reduces the power by 36.7%. More rotors are preferable from the point of view of power consumption. Too many rotors are unnecessary, since the extra benefit obtained is very diminished. Varying the rotor speed is better for performance improvement compared with varying the collective pitch, since lower rotor speed leads to rotor power reduction. The five-rotor configuration with fixed collective pitch reduces the power by 53.3%. The severe aerodynamic interference between the rotors leads to the longitudinal configuration of multi-rotor configuration having much poorer performance. The four-rotor configuration in a “plus” arrangement achieves better performance than the cross four-rotor configuration or a vertical four-rotor configuration.

ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Government of Jiangsu Province, Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Legal Cases and Commentary
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.