Exploratory learning before instruction: Comparing individual exploration, collaborative exploration, and preparation for future collaboration.

Instructors often prioritize traditional instruction in the classroom, despite evidence supporting the use of active learning methods. Exploratory learning, presenting novel problems to students before presenting information about the procedure and underlying concepts, can improve students’ conceptual understanding of instructional material. In exploratory learning, collaborative learning is often an important component of the instructional design. However, few researchers have directly compared collaborative and individual exploration to determine if there are benefits of adding collaboration to exploration. By disentangling exploratory and collaborative learning, we can learn how and why collaborative exploration fails or succeeds. One idea is that adding individual preparation before peer collaboration (PFC), followed by direct instruction, might offer learning benefits beyond each instructional method alone. The current experiments directly compared individual exploration, collaborative exploration, and PFC. Experiment 1 (N = 177) and Experiment 2 (N = 196) compared three exploratory learning conditions: collaborative, PFC, and individual conditions. In Experiment 1, students in collaborative conditions reported higher situational interest, curiosity, self-efficacy, active engagement, and interactive engagement, and the PFC condition reported higher self-efficacy, active, and interactive engagement compared to the individual condition, but the findings were not replicated in Experiment 2. In Experiment 2, students in the individual condition had higher conceptual knowledge scores compared to the collaborative and PFC conditions. Students in the PFC condition had higher conceptual transfer scores than those in the individual condition, which could be explained by constructive and interactive engagement. There were no significant differences in procedural knowledge and procedural transfer across conditions. When choosing which exploratory learning instructional design to use, practitioners should consider the type of knowledge to target. Overall, individual exploration might better suit conceptual knowledge, and PFC might be better for conceptual transfer.

Publication Details

Journal
ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploratory learning before instruction: Comparing individual exploration, collaborative exploration, and preparation for future collaboration.

ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Exploratory learning before instruction: Comparing individual exploration, collaborative exploration, and preparation for future collaboration.

article en

Abstract

Instructors often prioritize traditional instruction in the classroom, despite evidence supporting the use of active learning methods. Exploratory learning, presenting novel problems to students before presenting information about the procedure and underlying concepts, can improve students’ conceptual understanding of instructional material. In exploratory learning, collaborative learning is often an important component of the instructional design. However, few researchers have directly compared collaborative and individual exploration to determine if there are benefits of adding collaboration to exploration. By disentangling exploratory and collaborative learning, we can learn how and why collaborative exploration fails or succeeds. One idea is that adding individual preparation before peer collaboration (PFC), followed by direct instruction, might offer learning benefits beyond each instructional method alone. The current experiments directly compared individual exploration, collaborative exploration, and PFC. Experiment 1 (N = 177) and Experiment 2 (N = 196) compared three exploratory learning conditions: collaborative, PFC, and individual conditions. In Experiment 1, students in collaborative conditions reported higher situational interest, curiosity, self-efficacy, active engagement, and interactive engagement, and the PFC condition reported higher self-efficacy, active, and interactive engagement compared to the individual condition, but the findings were not replicated in Experiment 2. In Experiment 2, students in the individual condition had higher conceptual knowledge scores compared to the collaborative and PFC conditions. Students in the PFC condition had higher conceptual transfer scores than those in the individual condition, which could be explained by constructive and interactive engagement. There were no significant differences in procedural knowledge and procedural transfer across conditions. When choosing which exploratory learning instructional design to use, practitioners should consider the type of knowledge to target. Overall, individual exploration might better suit conceptual knowledge, and PFC might be better for conceptual transfer.

ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.