Exploring Human-Conversational Agent Team Dynamics

Technological advancements empower conversational agents (CAs) to perform team tasks that, until recently, were exclusively handled by humans. Thus, CAs contribute to team collaborations. Yet it remains unclear whether humans perceive CAs as part of the team, and whether human-CA collaborations are comparable to human-only teams. This work investigates the impact of a chatbot adopting a Scrum Master assistant (SM) role on emerging team dynamics in a lab experiment with 150 participants. The preliminary findings suggest that CAs are attributed lower team membership than humans. Ingroup perception revealed to be a crucial antecedent for individual satisfaction with the SM, resulting in higher team mental model formation and trust in the SM. The findings suggest that ingroup perception explains the difference of team dynamics across various teams (i.e., human-only and human-CA teams). With additional data, we will contribute to research on ingroup identification in human-CA team dynamics.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Human-Conversational Agent Team Dynamics

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
article

Exploring Human-Conversational Agent Team Dynamics

article en

Abstract

Technological advancements empower conversational agents (CAs) to perform team tasks that, until recently, were exclusively handled by humans. Thus, CAs contribute to team collaborations. Yet it remains unclear whether humans perceive CAs as part of the team, and whether human-CA collaborations are comparable to human-only teams. This work investigates the impact of a chatbot adopting a Scrum Master assistant (SM) role on emerging team dynamics in a lab experiment with 150 participants. The preliminary findings suggest that CAs are attributed lower team membership than humans. Ingroup perception revealed to be a crucial antecedent for individual satisfaction with the SM, resulting in higher team mental model formation and trust in the SM. The findings suggest that ingroup perception explains the difference of team dynamics across various teams (i.e., human-only and human-CA teams). With additional data, we will contribute to research on ingroup identification in human-CA team dynamics.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring Human-Conversational Agent Team Dynamics · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS