Empowering Children: Ethical Decision Making in Research through a Strength-Based Approach

Research with children, particularly those deemed to have special educational needs (SEN), traditionally takes the form of a deficit model, whereby the decision to engage is taken away from the child and instead sought from an appropriate adult. Whilst the present approach seeks to alleviate risk of harm to child participants, we contend that the current process of bypassing the child, may inadvertently do more harm than good. The process of seeking consent for a child’s engagement via an appropriate adult, discredits the child’s unique strengths and capabilities, essentially withholding their right to be heard. We argue a case for a paradigm shift from the traditional deficit model to a strengths-based approach that empowers children to take the lead. This chapter explores the ways in which a strengths-based approach might be achieved. Considerations include de-mystification of the research process, navigation of ethical dilemmas and accessibility of meaningful consent. Through taking a positivist approach, we seek ways in which we might create meaningful engagement opportunities that amplify the voices of children so that they are no longer withheld, overpowered, or silenced, but instead, engaged, understood, and empowered.

Publication Details

Journal
Liverpool John Moores University
Published
2025-11-05
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empowering Children: Ethical Decision Making in Research through a Strength-Based Approach

Liverpool John Moores University
Children's Rights and Participation
article

Empowering Children: Ethical Decision Making in Research through a Strength-Based Approach

article en

Abstract

Research with children, particularly those deemed to have special educational needs (SEN), traditionally takes the form of a deficit model, whereby the decision to engage is taken away from the child and instead sought from an appropriate adult. Whilst the present approach seeks to alleviate risk of harm to child participants, we contend that the current process of bypassing the child, may inadvertently do more harm than good. The process of seeking consent for a child’s engagement via an appropriate adult, discredits the child’s unique strengths and capabilities, essentially withholding their right to be heard. We argue a case for a paradigm shift from the traditional deficit model to a strengths-based approach that empowers children to take the lead. This chapter explores the ways in which a strengths-based approach might be achieved. Considerations include de-mystification of the research process, navigation of ethical dilemmas and accessibility of meaningful consent. Through taking a positivist approach, we seek ways in which we might create meaningful engagement opportunities that amplify the voices of children so that they are no longer withheld, overpowered, or silenced, but instead, engaged, understood, and empowered.

Liverpool John Moores University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Children's Rights and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.