Double, Double, Toils and Troubles: Analyzing the “Magical” Relationships between University Leaders’ Personality Traits and their Self-Efficacy in Leadership Situations

This present study investigated the relationship between higher education leaders’ personality traits and their self-efficacy in leadership situations. A total of 151 leaders employed across the nine institutions within the University of Louisiana System completed a survey that prompted them to identify their personal values, traits, and skill sets, as derived from the online Pottermore quiz, the official Harry Potter Hogwarts House sorting instrument. This niche personality metric was chosen to cater to higher education’s evolving landscape, as it welcomes an influx of Millennials into leadership positions. Participants’ responses were eventually recoded to “sort” them into their respective Houses: Gryffindor, Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, or Slytherin. The survey also prompted them to indicate their feelings of adequacy in handling scenarios that fell within four situational categories: managing crises, promoting camaraderie, strategic planning, or administering discipline. Demographic data, such as current job title/position, age, and years of leadership experience were also considered in the post-data analysis, which resulted in an emergent independent variable: management levels. Means analyses and a review of the literature supported the four hypotheses’ predictions: Gryffindors felt most equipped to manage crises, Hufflepuffs preferred to promote camaraderie, Ravenclaws excelled at strategic planning, and Slytherins were comfortable with administering discipline. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were used but may not be a reliable measure for this study’s intentions due to the unequal distribution within the sample. This study provides implications about proper selection of statistical tests, the need for better crisis management training, team diversification, and shifts in generational references and metrics within the higher education workforce.

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarWorks @ The University of New Orleans (The University of New Orleans)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Double, Double, Toils and Troubles: Analyzing the “Magical” Relationships between University Leaders’ Personality Traits and their Self-Efficacy in Leadership Situations

ScholarWorks @ The University of New Orleans (The University of New Orleans)
Social Media and Politics
article

Double, Double, Toils and Troubles: Analyzing the “Magical” Relationships between University Leaders’ Personality Traits and their Self-Efficacy in Leadership Situations

article en

Abstract

This present study investigated the relationship between higher education leaders’ personality traits and their self-efficacy in leadership situations. A total of 151 leaders employed across the nine institutions within the University of Louisiana System completed a survey that prompted them to identify their personal values, traits, and skill sets, as derived from the online Pottermore quiz, the official Harry Potter Hogwarts House sorting instrument. This niche personality metric was chosen to cater to higher education’s evolving landscape, as it welcomes an influx of Millennials into leadership positions. Participants’ responses were eventually recoded to “sort” them into their respective Houses: Gryffindor, Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, or Slytherin. The survey also prompted them to indicate their feelings of adequacy in handling scenarios that fell within four situational categories: managing crises, promoting camaraderie, strategic planning, or administering discipline. Demographic data, such as current job title/position, age, and years of leadership experience were also considered in the post-data analysis, which resulted in an emergent independent variable: management levels. Means analyses and a review of the literature supported the four hypotheses’ predictions: Gryffindors felt most equipped to manage crises, Hufflepuffs preferred to promote camaraderie, Ravenclaws excelled at strategic planning, and Slytherins were comfortable with administering discipline. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were used but may not be a reliable measure for this study’s intentions due to the unequal distribution within the sample. This study provides implications about proper selection of statistical tests, the need for better crisis management training, team diversification, and shifts in generational references and metrics within the higher education workforce.

ScholarWorks @ The University of New Orleans (The University of New Orleans)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.