Does automation empower? An analysis using Arendt’s conception of work

Automation frees workers from drudgery and empowers them to engage in higher value work. This is the received wisdom around the impact of automating work. In this essay, we argue that with the emergence of cognitive automation this narrative warrants scrutiny. Drawing on Hannah Arendt's conceptions of labour, work and action, we argue that automation in knowledge work often disempowers workers. With case vignettes, we illustrate how cognitive automation can lead to the creation of more tedious labour, fracturing of work, and curtailing of action and speech. The analysis reveals that, paradoxically, automation's promise to empower workers is undermined by the very ideology driving its implementation. For automation to truly support good work, we must rethink its design through Arendtian 'forgiveness and promise', balancing machine and human contributions. Our analysis reveals automation's complex ramifications for worker empowerment and identity, highlighting the need for a thoughtful, human-centric approach to work automation.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2024-12-10
Primary Topic
Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does automation empower? An analysis using Arendt’s conception of work

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties
article

Does automation empower? An analysis using Arendt’s conception of work

article en

Abstract

Automation frees workers from drudgery and empowers them to engage in higher value work. This is the received wisdom around the impact of automating work. In this essay, we argue that with the emergence of cognitive automation this narrative warrants scrutiny. Drawing on Hannah Arendt's conceptions of labour, work and action, we argue that automation in knowledge work often disempowers workers. With case vignettes, we illustrate how cognitive automation can lead to the creation of more tedious labour, fracturing of work, and curtailing of action and speech. The analysis reveals that, paradoxically, automation's promise to empower workers is undermined by the very ideology driving its implementation. For automation to truly support good work, we must rethink its design through Arendtian 'forgiveness and promise', balancing machine and human contributions. Our analysis reveals automation's complex ramifications for worker empowerment and identity, highlighting the need for a thoughtful, human-centric approach to work automation.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.