The Distributional Effects of Firm Demand Changes: Evidence from U.S. Linked Worker-Owner Data

This project analyzes the distributional incidence of firm-level demand shocks using novel U.S. administrative data linking firms, workers, and owners. We use export demand variation and value-added innovations as quasi-experimental firm demand shocks. Our preliminary analysis shows that the incidence of these shocks—that is, which individuals benefit or lose when demand changes—is highly skewed. Individuals in the top 1% of the income distribution receive 30-60% of incidence, while those in the bottom 50% receive less than 15%. The reason for this unequal distribution is that firm owners bear most of the incidence and are frequently in the top of the distribution. However, the incidence is asymmetric for positive versus negative demand changes. While workers receive a small share of the benefits of positive firm shocks, they bear a larger share of the losses from negative shocks. These findings suggest that the incidence of several firm-level government policies is highly unequal. Additionally, the asymmetry result presents a puzzle for standard models of rent-sharing and firm insurance, which predict symmetric responses to positive and negative demand changes.

Publication Details

Journal
Upjohn Research (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research)
Published
2025-04-08
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Distributional Effects of Firm Demand Changes: Evidence from U.S. Linked Worker-Owner Data

Upjohn Research (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research)
Global trade and economics
article

The Distributional Effects of Firm Demand Changes: Evidence from U.S. Linked Worker-Owner Data

article en

Abstract

This project analyzes the distributional incidence of firm-level demand shocks using novel U.S. administrative data linking firms, workers, and owners. We use export demand variation and value-added innovations as quasi-experimental firm demand shocks. Our preliminary analysis shows that the incidence of these shocks—that is, which individuals benefit or lose when demand changes—is highly skewed. Individuals in the top 1% of the income distribution receive 30-60% of incidence, while those in the bottom 50% receive less than 15%. The reason for this unequal distribution is that firm owners bear most of the incidence and are frequently in the top of the distribution. However, the incidence is asymmetric for positive versus negative demand changes. While workers receive a small share of the benefits of positive firm shocks, they bear a larger share of the losses from negative shocks. These findings suggest that the incidence of several firm-level government policies is highly unequal. Additionally, the asymmetry result presents a puzzle for standard models of rent-sharing and firm insurance, which predict symmetric responses to positive and negative demand changes.

Upjohn Research (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Distributional Effects of Firm Demand Changes: Evidence from U.S. Linked Worker-Owner Data · Upjohn Research (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS