Discussing three frameworks of reflection in language teacher education

The present article discusses three different frameworks of Reflective Practice (RP) intended to foster reflection in the fields of English Language Teaching (ELT) and Language Teacher Education (LTE). Therefore, we look at structural platforms of procedures or ways of engaging in reflection and/or analysing its outcomes. The following are the frameworks, discussed in terms of their contribution for the refinement of both individual and collaborative professional development: Zwozdiak-Myers’s framework of reflective practice, Farrell’s Framework for reflecting on practice and Edge’s framework of cooperative development. We look into the term critical in the field of LTE and discuss the frameworks after a brief overview of the complexities involved in reflection, ranging from daily classroom procedures, to hegemonic assumptions and personal philosophical stances, including assumptions and beliefs. In a very generalised way, it can be said that the first two frameworks are designed to guide and structure evidence of reflection in self-study, whereas the third one takes a more collaborative approach, although the three frameworks can be complementary and may have practical overlaps of application. LTE. Reflective Practice. Frameworks.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discussing three frameworks of reflection in language teacher education

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Research Data Management Practices
article

Discussing three frameworks of reflection in language teacher education

article en

Abstract

The present article discusses three different frameworks of Reflective Practice (RP) intended to foster reflection in the fields of English Language Teaching (ELT) and Language Teacher Education (LTE). Therefore, we look at structural platforms of procedures or ways of engaging in reflection and/or analysing its outcomes. The following are the frameworks, discussed in terms of their contribution for the refinement of both individual and collaborative professional development: Zwozdiak-Myers’s framework of reflective practice, Farrell’s Framework for reflecting on practice and Edge’s framework of cooperative development. We look into the term critical in the field of LTE and discuss the frameworks after a brief overview of the complexities involved in reflection, ranging from daily classroom procedures, to hegemonic assumptions and personal philosophical stances, including assumptions and beliefs. In a very generalised way, it can be said that the first two frameworks are designed to guide and structure evidence of reflection in self-study, whereas the third one takes a more collaborative approach, although the three frameworks can be complementary and may have practical overlaps of application. LTE. Reflective Practice. Frameworks.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.