Diaphragm Assessment by Multimodal Ultrasound Imaging in Healthy Subjects

Tianjie Zhang,1 Yan Liu,1 Dongwei Xu,2 Rui Dong,1 Ye Song1 1Department of Ultrasonography, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, 201318, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Ye Song, Email [email protected]: In recent years, diaphragm ultrasound (DUS) has been used to identify diaphragm dysfunction in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, there are few studies on DUS parameters to evaluate function, normal ranges, and influencing factors in population. The aim of this study is to provide a methodological reference for clinical evaluation of diaphragm function by measuring different DUS parameters in a healthy population.Methods: A descriptive study was conducted 212 (105 males, 107 females) subjects with normal spirometry underwent ultrasound imaging in this study. The diaphragm contraction and motion related parameters and shear wave velocity (SWV) were measured in the supine position. The effects of gender, age, body mass index (BMI) and lifestyle on diaphragm ultrasound parameters were analyzed.Results: The diaphragm thickness at end-expiration (DT-exp) was 0.14 ± 0.05 cm, the diaphragm thickness at end- inspiration (DT-insp) was 0.29± 0.10 cm, with thickening fraction (TF) was 1.11± 0.54. The diaphragm excursion (DE) was 1.68± 0.37cm and diaphragm velocity was 1.45± 0.41 cm/s during calm breathing. During deep breathing, the DE was 5.06± 1.40cm and diaphragm velocity was 3.20± 1.18 cm/s. The Diaphragm shear modulus—longitudinal view were Mean16.72± 4.07kPa, Max25.04± 5.58kPa, Min11.06± 3.88kPa, SD2.56± 0.98. The results of diaphragmatic measurement showed that the DT of males was significantly greater than that of females (P< 0.05), but there was no significant difference in TF. The DT-insp (r=0.155, P= 0.024) and the DT-exp (r=0.252, P=0.000) were positively correlated with age, and the DE during calm breathing was negatively correlated with age (r=− 0.218, P= 0.001) and BMI (r=− 00.280, P= 0.000). The DE (R=0.371, P=0.000) and velocity (R=0.368, P=0.000) during deep breathing were correlated with lifestyle.Conclusion: Our study provides normal reference values of the diaphragm and evaluates the influence of gender, age, body mass index and lifestyle on diaphragmatic morphology.Keywords: diaphragm, reference values, ultrasound, supine position