Clinical Decision Support Systems in Ophthalmology: A Systematic Search and a Narrative Review

Purpose: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are advanced tools that enhance clinical decision-making by integrating patient data with evidence-based evidence. In ophthalmology, these systems can potentially improve diagnostic accuracy, optimize treatment plans, and streamline patient management. This narrative review aimed to explore the current landscape of CDSS in ophthalmology, evaluating its applications, benefits, and limitations. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted, focusing on publications from the past decade that discuss the development, implementation, and efficacy of CDSS in ophthalmology. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched using relevant keywords. Articles were selected based on their relevance to clinical outcomes, technological innovation, and integration into ophthalmic practice. Results: The review identified various CDSS applications in ophthalmology, including tools for diagnosing retinal diseases, glaucoma management, and diabetic retinopathy screening. These systems leverage artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms to provide real-time support to clinicians. Despite their potential, challenges such as data integration, user adoption, and regulatory approval remain significant barriers to widespread implementation. Conclusion: Clinical decision support systems in ophthalmology offer promising avenues for enhancing patient care and clinical efficiency. However, further research and development are necessary to address current limitations and ensure these systems are effectively integrated into routine ophthalmic practice.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-09-01
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Decision Support Systems in Ophthalmology: A Systematic Search and a Narrative Review

3 citations
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
3.44
article

Clinical Decision Support Systems in Ophthalmology: A Systematic Search and a Narrative Review

article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are advanced tools that enhance clinical decision-making by integrating patient data with evidence-based evidence. In ophthalmology, these systems can potentially improve diagnostic accuracy, optimize treatment plans, and streamline patient management. This narrative review aimed to explore the current landscape of CDSS in ophthalmology, evaluating its applications, benefits, and limitations. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted, focusing on publications from the past decade that discuss the development, implementation, and efficacy of CDSS in ophthalmology. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched using relevant keywords. Articles were selected based on their relevance to clinical outcomes, technological innovation, and integration into ophthalmic practice. Results: The review identified various CDSS applications in ophthalmology, including tools for diagnosing retinal diseases, glaucoma management, and diabetic retinopathy screening. These systems leverage artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms to provide real-time support to clinicians. Despite their potential, challenges such as data integration, user adoption, and regulatory approval remain significant barriers to widespread implementation. Conclusion: Clinical decision support systems in ophthalmology offer promising avenues for enhancing patient care and clinical efficiency. However, further research and development are necessary to address current limitations and ensure these systems are effectively integrated into routine ophthalmic practice.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.