Caught in the deglobalisation crosswind? De-risking by “China+1” or “In-China-For-China”

<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> Foreign firms in China, particularly those from the Global West, are in a difficult position as deglobalisation and strained international relations create risk. This paper offers research avenues on how operations and supply chain management scholars can analyse the risk factors, de-risking practices, and de-risking outcomes of foreign firms in China.</p>\n<p><strong>Design/methodology/approach:</strong> This paper is primarily based on interviews with managers of foreign firms’ subsidiaries and joint ventures in China between late 2019 and early 2024 and employs institutional theory to develop a conceptual framework.</p>\n<p><strong>Findings:</strong> Six risk factors motivating foreign firms to consider “China+1” (diversification and multi-sourcing) or “In-China-For-China” (localisation with potential bifurcation) are identified. Four pathways focusing on politics, locations, technologies, and people enable further investigation of these de-risking strategies.</p>\n<p><strong>Originality/value:</strong> This is the first paper to take a deeper look at perceptions, worries, and considerations of foreign firms in China and offers specific recommendations for impactful research.</p>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-10-25
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caught in the deglobalisation crosswind? De-risking by “China+1” or “In-China-For-China”

Figshare
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Caught in the deglobalisation crosswind? De-risking by “China+1” or “In-China-For-China”

article en

Abstract

<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> Foreign firms in China, particularly those from the Global West, are in a difficult position as deglobalisation and strained international relations create risk. This paper offers research avenues on how operations and supply chain management scholars can analyse the risk factors, de-risking practices, and de-risking outcomes of foreign firms in China.</p>\n<p><strong>Design/methodology/approach:</strong> This paper is primarily based on interviews with managers of foreign firms’ subsidiaries and joint ventures in China between late 2019 and early 2024 and employs institutional theory to develop a conceptual framework.</p>\n<p><strong>Findings:</strong> Six risk factors motivating foreign firms to consider “China+1” (diversification and multi-sourcing) or “In-China-For-China” (localisation with potential bifurcation) are identified. Four pathways focusing on politics, locations, technologies, and people enable further investigation of these de-risking strategies.</p>\n<p><strong>Originality/value:</strong> This is the first paper to take a deeper look at perceptions, worries, and considerations of foreign firms in China and offers specific recommendations for impactful research.</p>

Figshare
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Caught in the deglobalisation crosswind? De-risking by “China+1” or “In-China-For-China” · Figshare (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS