A Call to Study the Bidirectional Relationship Between Healthcare Accessibility Issues and Medical Gaslighting for Marginalized Groups with Chronic Pain

Chronic pain is an epidemic in its own right. Affecting 21% of American adults and costing $300 billion each year, chronic pain rivals cancer, diabetes, and hypertension combined. From psychological impacts on patients to worsening health outcomes further burdening the healthcare system and billions of lost productivity stressing the economy, chronic pain can affect all Americans. However, chronic pain disproportionately afflicts marginalized groups including non-whites, women, and disadvantaged socioeconomic classes. For decades, research has demonstrated disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and management of chronic pain are associated with accessibility issues in healthcare, a link that is likely the result of systemic discrimination. More recently, the inequality of care for disparaged patients has also been connected to a psychological phenomena freshly coined as “medical gaslighting.” Medical gaslighting can include minimization of pain symptoms, paternalism, and even dismissal of physical disease. Despite the popularity of both topics in research, the potential relationship between accessibility and medical gaslighting has never been studied. Given that both greatly affect disadvantaged populations on an individual level, within the healthcare system, and the overall economy, their contributions to the systemic problems pervasive throughout medicine should be better understood. Ending the bidirectional relationship between accessibility and medical gaslighting is one large step toward ending health inequalities.

Publication Details

Journal
Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Published
2024-11-04
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education, sociology, and vocational training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Call to Study the Bidirectional Relationship Between Healthcare Accessibility Issues and Medical Gaslighting for Marginalized Groups with Chronic Pain

1 citations
Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Education, sociology, and vocational training
1.13
article

A Call to Study the Bidirectional Relationship Between Healthcare Accessibility Issues and Medical Gaslighting for Marginalized Groups with Chronic Pain

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Chronic pain is an epidemic in its own right. Affecting 21% of American adults and costing $300 billion each year, chronic pain rivals cancer, diabetes, and hypertension combined. From psychological impacts on patients to worsening health outcomes further burdening the healthcare system and billions of lost productivity stressing the economy, chronic pain can affect all Americans. However, chronic pain disproportionately afflicts marginalized groups including non-whites, women, and disadvantaged socioeconomic classes. For decades, research has demonstrated disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and management of chronic pain are associated with accessibility issues in healthcare, a link that is likely the result of systemic discrimination. More recently, the inequality of care for disparaged patients has also been connected to a psychological phenomena freshly coined as “medical gaslighting.” Medical gaslighting can include minimization of pain symptoms, paternalism, and even dismissal of physical disease. Despite the popularity of both topics in research, the potential relationship between accessibility and medical gaslighting has never been studied. Given that both greatly affect disadvantaged populations on an individual level, within the healthcare system, and the overall economy, their contributions to the systemic problems pervasive throughout medicine should be better understood. Ending the bidirectional relationship between accessibility and medical gaslighting is one large step toward ending health inequalities.

Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Education, sociology, and vocational training
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.