Blending Online and In-Person Seminars to Strengthen Clinical Placement Learning in Physiotherapy Education

Slawomir Wojniusz, Anne Gudrun Langaas, Yngve Røe Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, NorwayCorrespondence: Slawomir Wojniusz, Oslo Metropolitan University, Postboks 4, St. Olavs plass, Oslo, 0130, Norway, Email [email protected]: Digital technology continues to reshape health professions education, yet little is known about the relative effectiveness of synchronous online versus in-person collaborative learning in strengthening clinical placement experiences for physiotherapy students. This study examined physiotherapy students’ expectations, perceptions, and preferences regarding online and in-person small-group seminars.Methods: A quasi-randomized crossover design was used in two course iterations (I-1, I-2) involving 106 final-semester physiotherapy students. Participants were split into groups of 5– 6 to engage in ten seminars discussing complex clinical cases drawn from their prior placements, with half of the groups starting online and later switching to in-person, and vice versa. A third iteration (I-3; n=77) alternated between online and in-person sessions following two initial in-person seminars. Data were gathered through anonymous electronic surveys containing Likert-scale ratings and open-text responses. Quantitative data were analyzed with t-tests and chi-square tests; qualitative comments underwent thematic analysis.Results: Mid-course evaluations revealed no significant differences in perceived effectiveness when students had experienced only one format. By the course’s end, however most students ultimately favored in-person seminars for richer social interaction (I-2: 80%; I-1: 38%; I-3: 54%), although they consistently recognized online sessions as time-efficient and flexible. Notably, students’ initial expectations (I-1 and I-2) strongly mirrored their final evaluations. Qualitative feedback highlighted that in-person seminars provided higher-quality social interactions, while online seminars offered greater efficiency and flexibility. Most students indicated a preference for a blended format in future courses.Conclusion: By blending in-person and online sessions, collaborative seminars can give physiotherapy students the best of both worlds for their clinical placement learning. Meeting in-person fosters richer discussions and deeper social connections, while online sessions offer efficiency, flexibility and help students develop essential digital competence. Together, these formats create a more adaptable, forward-looking learning environment that aligns with the evolving demands of professional practice.Keywords: collaborative learning, online learning, health professions education, group seminars, physiotherapy education, clinical placement

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Plant and fungal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blending Online and In-Person Seminars to Strengthen Clinical Placement Learning in Physiotherapy Education

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Plant and fungal interactions
article

Blending Online and In-Person Seminars to Strengthen Clinical Placement Learning in Physiotherapy Education

article en

Abstract

Slawomir Wojniusz, Anne Gudrun Langaas, Yngve Røe Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, NorwayCorrespondence: Slawomir Wojniusz, Oslo Metropolitan University, Postboks 4, St. Olavs plass, Oslo, 0130, Norway, Email [email protected]: Digital technology continues to reshape health professions education, yet little is known about the relative effectiveness of synchronous online versus in-person collaborative learning in strengthening clinical placement experiences for physiotherapy students. This study examined physiotherapy students’ expectations, perceptions, and preferences regarding online and in-person small-group seminars.Methods: A quasi-randomized crossover design was used in two course iterations (I-1, I-2) involving 106 final-semester physiotherapy students. Participants were split into groups of 5– 6 to engage in ten seminars discussing complex clinical cases drawn from their prior placements, with half of the groups starting online and later switching to in-person, and vice versa. A third iteration (I-3; n=77) alternated between online and in-person sessions following two initial in-person seminars. Data were gathered through anonymous electronic surveys containing Likert-scale ratings and open-text responses. Quantitative data were analyzed with t-tests and chi-square tests; qualitative comments underwent thematic analysis.Results: Mid-course evaluations revealed no significant differences in perceived effectiveness when students had experienced only one format. By the course’s end, however most students ultimately favored in-person seminars for richer social interaction (I-2: 80%; I-1: 38%; I-3: 54%), although they consistently recognized online sessions as time-efficient and flexible. Notably, students’ initial expectations (I-1 and I-2) strongly mirrored their final evaluations. Qualitative feedback highlighted that in-person seminars provided higher-quality social interactions, while online seminars offered greater efficiency and flexibility. Most students indicated a preference for a blended format in future courses.Conclusion: By blending in-person and online sessions, collaborative seminars can give physiotherapy students the best of both worlds for their clinical placement learning. Meeting in-person fosters richer discussions and deeper social connections, while online sessions offer efficiency, flexibility and help students develop essential digital competence. Together, these formats create a more adaptable, forward-looking learning environment that aligns with the evolving demands of professional practice.Keywords: collaborative learning, online learning, health professions education, group seminars, physiotherapy education, clinical placement

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Plant and fungal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.