AI in Search Engines: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

This paper examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) models in search engines, exploring their accuracy, reliability, and ethical implications. Testing popular AI-enhanced search engines and AI models, including Microsoft’s Copilot, Google’s AI Overview, DuckDuckGo’s AI Chat, and Perplexity, this paper compares their performance in answering factual and reasoning-based questions. Results revealed that while AI models generally provide accurate responses to straightforward queries, they often struggle with complex or reasoning-based questions. Solutions proposed to address these challenges include providing enhanced user control, improved ethical standards for AI data training, separation of traditional search engines and AI models, and promoting the use of alternative search engines and tools outside of the commercially used products. These solutions aim to improve user trust, transparency, and information reliability in AI-enhanced or powered search products. The findings are a call to action to encourage a balanced approach to integrating AI in search engines, prioritizing user choice, ethical considerations, and accuracy to create a more dependable search experience.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver)
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI in Search Engines: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI in Search Engines: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

article en

Abstract

This paper examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) models in search engines, exploring their accuracy, reliability, and ethical implications. Testing popular AI-enhanced search engines and AI models, including Microsoft’s Copilot, Google’s AI Overview, DuckDuckGo’s AI Chat, and Perplexity, this paper compares their performance in answering factual and reasoning-based questions. Results revealed that while AI models generally provide accurate responses to straightforward queries, they often struggle with complex or reasoning-based questions. Solutions proposed to address these challenges include providing enhanced user control, improved ethical standards for AI data training, separation of traditional search engines and AI models, and promoting the use of alternative search engines and tools outside of the commercially used products. These solutions aim to improve user trust, transparency, and information reliability in AI-enhanced or powered search products. The findings are a call to action to encourage a balanced approach to integrating AI in search engines, prioritizing user choice, ethical considerations, and accuracy to create a more dependable search experience.

Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.