A Comparative Analyses Of Network Formation In Low-power Lossy Networks: ContikiMAC vs Orchestra-enabled TSCH

Medium Access Control (MAC) layer protocols are the underlying paradigms which dictate the transmission & reception of data in any network. Particularly for Low-powered Lossy Networks (LLNs), the design and selection of appropiate MAC-layer protocols is crucial inorder to satisfy several networking objectives such as joining time, network lifetime, energy consumption, end-to-end-delay, etc. In this report, we have presented a comparative analysis between Contiki-MAC and Orchestra-enabled TSCH protocol which provides insights towards the network joining & convergence time as well as an estimate of the energy consumption required of build such LLNs. Our results indicates that Contiki-MAC outperforms Orchestra-enabled TSCH by a factor of 13 times in network formation.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-06-07
Primary Topic
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analyses Of Network Formation In Low-power Lossy Networks: ContikiMAC vs Orchestra-enabled TSCH

ArXiv.org
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
article

A Comparative Analyses Of Network Formation In Low-power Lossy Networks: ContikiMAC vs Orchestra-enabled TSCH

article en

Abstract

Medium Access Control (MAC) layer protocols are the underlying paradigms which dictate the transmission & reception of data in any network. Particularly for Low-powered Lossy Networks (LLNs), the design and selection of appropiate MAC-layer protocols is crucial inorder to satisfy several networking objectives such as joining time, network lifetime, energy consumption, end-to-end-delay, etc. In this report, we have presented a comparative analysis between Contiki-MAC and Orchestra-enabled TSCH protocol which provides insights towards the network joining & convergence time as well as an estimate of the energy consumption required of build such LLNs. Our results indicates that Contiki-MAC outperforms Orchestra-enabled TSCH by a factor of 13 times in network formation.

ArXiv.org
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analyses Of Network Formation In Low-power Lossy Networks: ContikiMAC vs Orchestra-enabled TSCH · ArXiv.org (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS