Algorithmic Collusion under Observed Demand Shocks

This paper examines how the observability of demand shocks influences pricing patterns and market outcomes when firms delegate pricing decisions to Q-learning algorithms. Simulations show that demand observability induces Q-learning agents to adapt prices to demand fluctuations, giving rise to distinctive demand-contingent pricing patterns across the discount factor $δ$, consistent with Rotemberg and Saloner (1986). When $δ$ is high, they learn procyclical pricing, charging higher prices in higher demand states. In contrast, at low $δ$, they lower prices during booms and raise them during downturns, exhibiting countercyclical pricing. Q-learning agents also autonomously sustain supracompetitive profits, indicating that demand observability does not hinder algorithmic collusion. I further explore how the information available to algorithms shapes their learned pricing behavior. Overall, the results suggest that, through pure trial and error, Q-learning algorithms internalize both the stronger deviation incentives during booms and the trade-off between short-term gains and long-term continuation values governed by the discount factor, thereby reproducing the cyclicality of pricing patterns predicted by collusion theory.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-02-20
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Collusion under Observed Demand Shocks

ArXiv.org
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

Algorithmic Collusion under Observed Demand Shocks

article en

Abstract

This paper examines how the observability of demand shocks influences pricing patterns and market outcomes when firms delegate pricing decisions to Q-learning algorithms. Simulations show that demand observability induces Q-learning agents to adapt prices to demand fluctuations, giving rise to distinctive demand-contingent pricing patterns across the discount factor $δ$, consistent with Rotemberg and Saloner (1986). When $δ$ is high, they learn procyclical pricing, charging higher prices in higher demand states. In contrast, at low $δ$, they lower prices during booms and raise them during downturns, exhibiting countercyclical pricing. Q-learning agents also autonomously sustain supracompetitive profits, indicating that demand observability does not hinder algorithmic collusion. I further explore how the information available to algorithms shapes their learned pricing behavior. Overall, the results suggest that, through pure trial and error, Q-learning algorithms internalize both the stronger deviation incentives during booms and the trade-off between short-term gains and long-term continuation values governed by the discount factor, thereby reproducing the cyclicality of pricing patterns predicted by collusion theory.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.