A Methodological Framework and Questionnaire for Investigating Perceived Algorithmic Fairness

This study explores perceptions of fairness in algorithmic decision-making among users in Bangladesh through a comprehensive mixed-methods approach. By integrating quantitative survey data with qualitative interview insights, we examine how cultural, social, and contextual factors influence users' understanding of fairness, transparency, and accountability in AI systems. Our findings reveal nuanced attitudes toward human oversight, explanation mechanisms, and contestability, highlighting the importance of culturally aware design principles for equitable and trustworthy algorithmic systems. These insights contribute to ongoing discussions on algorithmic fairness by foregrounding perspectives from a non-Western context, thus broadening the global dialogue on ethical AI deployment.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-08-07
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Methodological Framework and Questionnaire for Investigating Perceived Algorithmic Fairness

ArXiv.org
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A Methodological Framework and Questionnaire for Investigating Perceived Algorithmic Fairness

article en

Abstract

This study explores perceptions of fairness in algorithmic decision-making among users in Bangladesh through a comprehensive mixed-methods approach. By integrating quantitative survey data with qualitative interview insights, we examine how cultural, social, and contextual factors influence users' understanding of fairness, transparency, and accountability in AI systems. Our findings reveal nuanced attitudes toward human oversight, explanation mechanisms, and contestability, highlighting the importance of culturally aware design principles for equitable and trustworthy algorithmic systems. These insights contribute to ongoing discussions on algorithmic fairness by foregrounding perspectives from a non-Western context, thus broadening the global dialogue on ethical AI deployment.

ArXiv.org
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Methodological Framework and Questionnaire for Investigating Perceived Algorithmic Fairness · ArXiv.org (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS