Linear response of turbulence

We study the response of wind tunnel turbulence to perturbations using an active grid. We compare our findings to Kraichnan's linear response result $R(k,τ_d) = \exp(-k^2 \: τ_d^2 \: u^2)$ which predicts a decay of the response with increasing turbulence intensity $u$, wave number of the perturbation $k$ and delay time $τ_d$ since the perturbation was applied (kraichnan.1964). In our experiments we used two different mechanisms to create a perturbation of a pre--existing and well--developed turbulent flow. In the first case we combine both the turbulence generation and the additional random perturbation in the same active grid. We find that the reponse decays with increasing $τ_d$, but much slower than predicted, while the decay was virtually independent of the turbulence intensity. In the second type of experiments, we perturb an active grid-generated turbulent flow using a loudspeaker--driven synthetic jet. The perturbation is at a single wave number $k$, placed well inside the inertial range. The response was found to decay with increasing time delay $τ_d$, while the decay is faster for larger wave numbers, roughly as predicted by Kraichnan's model. However, also in this case the decay rate is independent of the turbulence intensity.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-08-07
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear response of turbulence

ArXiv.org
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
article

Linear response of turbulence

article en

Abstract

We study the response of wind tunnel turbulence to perturbations using an active grid. We compare our findings to Kraichnan's linear response result $R(k,τ_d) = \exp(-k^2 \: τ_d^2 \: u^2)$ which predicts a decay of the response with increasing turbulence intensity $u$, wave number of the perturbation $k$ and delay time $τ_d$ since the perturbation was applied (kraichnan.1964). In our experiments we used two different mechanisms to create a perturbation of a pre--existing and well--developed turbulent flow. In the first case we combine both the turbulence generation and the additional random perturbation in the same active grid. We find that the reponse decays with increasing $τ_d$, but much slower than predicted, while the decay was virtually independent of the turbulence intensity. In the second type of experiments, we perturb an active grid-generated turbulent flow using a loudspeaker--driven synthetic jet. The perturbation is at a single wave number $k$, placed well inside the inertial range. The response was found to decay with increasing time delay $τ_d$, while the decay is faster for larger wave numbers, roughly as predicted by Kraichnan's model. However, also in this case the decay rate is independent of the turbulence intensity.

ArXiv.org
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.