Binary and Ternary Quantization Can Enhance Feature Discrimination

Quantization is widely applied in machine learning to reduce computational and storage costs for both data and models. Considering that classification tasks are fundamental to the field, it is crucial to investigate how quantization impacts classification performance. Traditional research has focused on quantization errors, assuming that larger errors generally lead to lower classification accuracy. However, this assumption lacks a solid theoretical foundation and often contradicts empirical observations. For example, despite introducing significant errors, $\{0,1\}$-binary and $\{0, \pm1\}$-ternary quantized data have sometimes achieved classification accuracy comparable or even superior to full-precision data. To reasonably explain this phenomenon, a more accurate evaluation of classification performance is required. To achieve this, we propose a direct analysis of the feature discrimination of quantized data, instead of focusing on quantization errors. Our analysis reveals that both binary and ternary quantization can potentially enhance, rather than degrade, the feature discrimination of the original data. This finding is supported by classification experiments conducted on both synthetic and real data.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-04-18
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binary and Ternary Quantization Can Enhance Feature Discrimination

ArXiv.org
Machine Learning and Data Classification
article

Binary and Ternary Quantization Can Enhance Feature Discrimination

article en

Abstract

Quantization is widely applied in machine learning to reduce computational and storage costs for both data and models. Considering that classification tasks are fundamental to the field, it is crucial to investigate how quantization impacts classification performance. Traditional research has focused on quantization errors, assuming that larger errors generally lead to lower classification accuracy. However, this assumption lacks a solid theoretical foundation and often contradicts empirical observations. For example, despite introducing significant errors, $\{0,1\}$-binary and $\{0, \pm1\}$-ternary quantized data have sometimes achieved classification accuracy comparable or even superior to full-precision data. To reasonably explain this phenomenon, a more accurate evaluation of classification performance is required. To achieve this, we propose a direct analysis of the feature discrimination of quantized data, instead of focusing on quantization errors. Our analysis reveals that both binary and ternary quantization can potentially enhance, rather than degrade, the feature discrimination of the original data. This finding is supported by classification experiments conducted on both synthetic and real data.

ArXiv.org
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Binary and Ternary Quantization Can Enhance Feature Discrimination · ArXiv.org (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS