$\gamma W$-exchange contributions in neutron $\beta$ decay in the forward-angle limit

In this work, the contributions from $\gamma W$-exchange in neutron $\beta$ decay are estimated at the amplitude level. Using a general form for the electromagnetic (EM) form factors (FFs) of the proton, the EM FFs of the neutron, and the weak FFs of the $Wnp$ interaction as inputs, we present analytical expressions for the inner part of the $\gamma W$-exchange amplitude under the forward angle limit. The differences and relations between our method and those used in the references are discussed. To compare our numerical results with those provided in the references, we consider three types of FFs as examples. The numerical results show that when the favored EM FFs are used, our result for the contribution from the Fermi part is consistent with those reported in the references, while our results for the Gamow-Teller parts are about 7\% and 13\% larger than those reported in Ref.~\cite{Hayen-2021}.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-03-13
Primary Topic
Nuclear physics research studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

$\gamma W$-exchange contributions in neutron $\beta$ decay in the forward-angle limit

ArXiv.org
Nuclear physics research studies
article

$\gamma W$-exchange contributions in neutron $\beta$ decay in the forward-angle limit

article en

Abstract

In this work, the contributions from $\gamma W$-exchange in neutron $\beta$ decay are estimated at the amplitude level. Using a general form for the electromagnetic (EM) form factors (FFs) of the proton, the EM FFs of the neutron, and the weak FFs of the $Wnp$ interaction as inputs, we present analytical expressions for the inner part of the $\gamma W$-exchange amplitude under the forward angle limit. The differences and relations between our method and those used in the references are discussed. To compare our numerical results with those provided in the references, we consider three types of FFs as examples. The numerical results show that when the favored EM FFs are used, our result for the contribution from the Fermi part is consistent with those reported in the references, while our results for the Gamow-Teller parts are about 7\% and 13\% larger than those reported in Ref.~\cite{Hayen-2021}.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Nuclear physics research studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

$\gamma W$-exchange contributions in neutron $\beta$ decay in the forward-angle limit · ArXiv.org (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS