Vision: looking and seeing through our brain's information bottleneck

Our brain recognizes only a tiny fraction of sensory input, due to an information processing bottleneck. This blinds us to most visual inputs. Since we are blind to this blindness, only a recent framework highlights this bottleneck by formulating vision as mainly looking and seeing. Looking selects a tiny fraction of visual information for progression through the bottleneck, mainly by shifting gaze to center an attentional spotlight. Seeing decodes, i.e., recognizes, objects within the selected information. Since looking often occurs before seeing and evokes limited awareness, humans have the impression of seeing whole scenes clearly. According to the new framework, the bottleneck starts from the output of the primary visual cortex (V1) to downstream brain areas. This is motivated by the evidence-backed V1 Saliency Hypothesis (V1SH) that V1 creates a saliency map of the visual field to guide looking. Massive visual information loss downstream from V1 makes seeing vulnerable to ambiguity and illusions (errors). To overcome this, feedback from downstream to upstream areas such as V1 queries for additional relevant information. An integral part of this framework is the central-peripheral dichotomy (CPD) theory proposing that vision in the peripheral and central visual fields are specialized for looking (deciding where to shift the gaze) and seeing, respectively, and that the feedback query to aid seeing is mainly directed to the central visual field. This V1SH-Bottleneck-CPD framework predicts that the peripheral visual field, lacking feedback queries, is more vulnerable to illusions, and that such illusions become visible in the central visual field when the feedback query is compromised. We present theoretical predictions, experimental confirmations, a Feedforward-Feedback-Verify-and-reWeight (FFVW) algorithm for seeing through the bottleneck.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-03-24
Primary Topic
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vision: looking and seeing through our brain's information bottleneck

ArXiv.org
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
article

Vision: looking and seeing through our brain's information bottleneck

article en

Abstract

Our brain recognizes only a tiny fraction of sensory input, due to an information processing bottleneck. This blinds us to most visual inputs. Since we are blind to this blindness, only a recent framework highlights this bottleneck by formulating vision as mainly looking and seeing. Looking selects a tiny fraction of visual information for progression through the bottleneck, mainly by shifting gaze to center an attentional spotlight. Seeing decodes, i.e., recognizes, objects within the selected information. Since looking often occurs before seeing and evokes limited awareness, humans have the impression of seeing whole scenes clearly. According to the new framework, the bottleneck starts from the output of the primary visual cortex (V1) to downstream brain areas. This is motivated by the evidence-backed V1 Saliency Hypothesis (V1SH) that V1 creates a saliency map of the visual field to guide looking. Massive visual information loss downstream from V1 makes seeing vulnerable to ambiguity and illusions (errors). To overcome this, feedback from downstream to upstream areas such as V1 queries for additional relevant information. An integral part of this framework is the central-peripheral dichotomy (CPD) theory proposing that vision in the peripheral and central visual fields are specialized for looking (deciding where to shift the gaze) and seeing, respectively, and that the feedback query to aid seeing is mainly directed to the central visual field. This V1SH-Bottleneck-CPD framework predicts that the peripheral visual field, lacking feedback queries, is more vulnerable to illusions, and that such illusions become visible in the central visual field when the feedback query is compromised. We present theoretical predictions, experimental confirmations, a Feedforward-Feedback-Verify-and-reWeight (FFVW) algorithm for seeing through the bottleneck.

ArXiv.org
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.