Extensions of the regret-minimization algorithm for optimal design

We consider the problem of selecting a subset of points from a dataset of $n$ unlabeled examples for labeling, with the goal of training a multiclass classifier. To address this, we build upon the regret minimization framework introduced by Allen-Zhu et al. in "Near-optimal design of experiments via regret minimization" (ICML, 2017). We propose an alternative regularization scheme within this framework, which leads to a new sample selection objective along with a provable sample complexity bound that guarantees a $(1+ε)$-approximate solution. Additionally, we extend the regret minimization approach to handle experimental design in the ridge regression setting. We evaluate the selected samples using logistic regression and compare performance against several state-of-the-art methods. Our empirical results on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and a 50-class subset of ImageNet demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms competing approaches across most scenarios.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-03-25
Primary Topic
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extensions of the regret-minimization algorithm for optimal design

ArXiv.org
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
article

Extensions of the regret-minimization algorithm for optimal design

article en

Abstract

We consider the problem of selecting a subset of points from a dataset of $n$ unlabeled examples for labeling, with the goal of training a multiclass classifier. To address this, we build upon the regret minimization framework introduced by Allen-Zhu et al. in "Near-optimal design of experiments via regret minimization" (ICML, 2017). We propose an alternative regularization scheme within this framework, which leads to a new sample selection objective along with a provable sample complexity bound that guarantees a $(1+ε)$-approximate solution. Additionally, we extend the regret minimization approach to handle experimental design in the ridge regression setting. We evaluate the selected samples using logistic regression and compare performance against several state-of-the-art methods. Our empirical results on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and a 50-class subset of ImageNet demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms competing approaches across most scenarios.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.