Detecting Arbitrary Planted Subgraphs in Random Graphs

The problems of detecting and recovering planted structures/subgraphs in Erdős-Rényi random graphs, have received significant attention over the past three decades, leading to many exciting results and mathematical techniques. However, prior work has largely focused on specific ad hoc planted structures and inferential settings, while a general theory has remained elusive. In this paper, we bridge this gap by investigating the detection of an \emph{arbitrary} planted subgraph $Γ= Γ_n$ in an Erdős-Rényi random graph $\mathcal{G}(n, q_n)$, where the edge probability within $Γ$ is $p_n$. We examine both the statistical and computational aspects of this problem and establish the following results. In the dense regime, where the edge probabilities $p_n$ and $q_n$ are fixed, we tightly characterize the information-theoretic and computational thresholds for detecting $Γ$, and provide conditions under which a computational-statistical gap arises. Most notably, these thresholds depend on $Γ$ only through its number of edges, maximum degree, and maximum subgraph density. Our lower and upper bounds are general and apply to any value of $p_n$ and $q_n$ as functions of $n$. Accordingly, we also analyze the sparse regime where $q_n = Θ(n^{-α})$ and $p_n-q_n =Θ(q_n)$, with $α\in[0,2]$, as well as the critical regime where $p_n=1-o(1)$ and $q_n = Θ(n^{-α})$, both of which have been widely studied, for specific choices of $Γ$. For these regimes, we show that our bounds are tight for all planted subgraphs investigated in the literature thus far\textemdash{}and many more. Finally, we identify conditions under which detection undergoes sharp phase transition, where the boundaries at which algorithms succeed or fail shift abruptly as a function of $q_n$.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-03-24
Primary Topic
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Arbitrary Planted Subgraphs in Random Graphs

ArXiv.org
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
article

Detecting Arbitrary Planted Subgraphs in Random Graphs

article en

Abstract

The problems of detecting and recovering planted structures/subgraphs in Erdős-Rényi random graphs, have received significant attention over the past three decades, leading to many exciting results and mathematical techniques. However, prior work has largely focused on specific ad hoc planted structures and inferential settings, while a general theory has remained elusive. In this paper, we bridge this gap by investigating the detection of an \emph{arbitrary} planted subgraph $Γ= Γ_n$ in an Erdős-Rényi random graph $\mathcal{G}(n, q_n)$, where the edge probability within $Γ$ is $p_n$. We examine both the statistical and computational aspects of this problem and establish the following results. In the dense regime, where the edge probabilities $p_n$ and $q_n$ are fixed, we tightly characterize the information-theoretic and computational thresholds for detecting $Γ$, and provide conditions under which a computational-statistical gap arises. Most notably, these thresholds depend on $Γ$ only through its number of edges, maximum degree, and maximum subgraph density. Our lower and upper bounds are general and apply to any value of $p_n$ and $q_n$ as functions of $n$. Accordingly, we also analyze the sparse regime where $q_n = Θ(n^{-α})$ and $p_n-q_n =Θ(q_n)$, with $α\in[0,2]$, as well as the critical regime where $p_n=1-o(1)$ and $q_n = Θ(n^{-α})$, both of which have been widely studied, for specific choices of $Γ$. For these regimes, we show that our bounds are tight for all planted subgraphs investigated in the literature thus far\textemdash{}and many more. Finally, we identify conditions under which detection undergoes sharp phase transition, where the boundaries at which algorithms succeed or fail shift abruptly as a function of $q_n$.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detecting Arbitrary Planted Subgraphs in Random Graphs · ArXiv.org (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS