Adaptive Robust Optimization Models for DER Planning in Distribution Networks under Long- and Short-Term Uncertainties

This study introduces adaptive robust optimization (ARO) and adaptive robust stochastic optimization (ARSO) approaches to address long- and short-term uncertainties in the optimal sizing and placement of distributed energy resources in distribution networks. ARO models uncertainty using a Budget of Uncertainty (BoU), while ARSO distinguishes long-term (LT) demand (via BoU) and short-term (ST) photovoltaics generation (via scenarios). Adapted Benders cutting plane algorithms are presented to tackle the tri-level optimization challenges. The experiments consider a modified version of the IEEE 33 bus system to test these two approaches and also compare them with traditional robust and stochastic optimization models. The results indicate that distinguishing between LT and ST uncertainties using a hybrid formulation such ARSO yields a solution closer to the optimal solution under perfect information than ARO.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-03-22
Primary Topic
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive Robust Optimization Models for DER Planning in Distribution Networks under Long- and Short-Term Uncertainties

ArXiv.org
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
article

Adaptive Robust Optimization Models for DER Planning in Distribution Networks under Long- and Short-Term Uncertainties

article en

Abstract

This study introduces adaptive robust optimization (ARO) and adaptive robust stochastic optimization (ARSO) approaches to address long- and short-term uncertainties in the optimal sizing and placement of distributed energy resources in distribution networks. ARO models uncertainty using a Budget of Uncertainty (BoU), while ARSO distinguishes long-term (LT) demand (via BoU) and short-term (ST) photovoltaics generation (via scenarios). Adapted Benders cutting plane algorithms are presented to tackle the tri-level optimization challenges. The experiments consider a modified version of the IEEE 33 bus system to test these two approaches and also compare them with traditional robust and stochastic optimization models. The results indicate that distinguishing between LT and ST uncertainties using a hybrid formulation such ARSO yields a solution closer to the optimal solution under perfect information than ARO.

ArXiv.org
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.