On the best accuracy using the $h$-adaptive finite element refinement

In \cite{liu2022practical}, a general algorithm is developed to efficiently obtain the best accuracy using the regular refinement. The adaptive refinement allows for obtaining an accuracy with a smaller number of DoFs compared with the regular refinement. In this paper, we investigate the best accuracy when using the adaptive refinement. To this end, we study the evolution of the truncation error and the round-off error using the adaptive refinement. For the former, a new threshold for the selection of the number of elements to be refined is proposed. For the latter, the round-off error is quantified using the method proposed in \cite{liu2022practical}. Moreover, for achieving a tolerance, we propose to use the line of the round-off error as a stopping criterion.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-03-24
Primary Topic
Numerical methods in engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the best accuracy using the $h$-adaptive finite element refinement

ArXiv.org
Numerical methods in engineering
article

On the best accuracy using the $h$-adaptive finite element refinement

article en

Abstract

In \cite{liu2022practical}, a general algorithm is developed to efficiently obtain the best accuracy using the regular refinement. The adaptive refinement allows for obtaining an accuracy with a smaller number of DoFs compared with the regular refinement. In this paper, we investigate the best accuracy when using the adaptive refinement. To this end, we study the evolution of the truncation error and the round-off error using the adaptive refinement. For the former, a new threshold for the selection of the number of elements to be refined is proposed. For the latter, the round-off error is quantified using the method proposed in \cite{liu2022practical}. Moreover, for achieving a tolerance, we propose to use the line of the round-off error as a stopping criterion.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Numerical methods in engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the best accuracy using the $h$-adaptive finite element refinement · ArXiv.org (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS