On the $(k,\ell)$-multiset anonymity measure for social graphs

The publication of social graphs must be preceded by a rigorous analysis of privacy threats against social graph users. When the threat comes from inside the social network itself, the threat is called an active attack, and the de-facto privacy measure used to quantify the resistance to such an attack is the $(k,\ell)$-anonymity. The original formulation of $(k,\ell)$-anonymity represents the adversary's knowledge as a vector of distances to the set of attacker nodes. In this article, we argue that such adversary is too strong when it comes to counteracting active attacks. We, instead, propose a new formulation where the adversary's knowledge is the multiset of distances to the set of attacker nodes. The goal of this article is to study the $(k,\ell)$-multiset anonymity from a graph theoretical point of view, while establishing its relationship to $(k,\ell)$-anonymity in one hand, and considering the $k$-multiset antiresolving sets as its theoretical frame, in a second one. That is, we prove properties of some graph families in relation to whether they contain a set of attacker nodes that breaks the $(k,\ell)$-multiset anonymity. From a practical point of view, we develop a linear programming formulation of the $k$-multiset antiresolving sets that allows us to calculate the resistance of social graphs against active attacks. This is useful for analysts who wish to know the level of privacy offered by a graph.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-07-11
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the $(k,\ell)$-multiset anonymity measure for social graphs

ArXiv.org
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

On the $(k,\ell)$-multiset anonymity measure for social graphs

article en

Abstract

The publication of social graphs must be preceded by a rigorous analysis of privacy threats against social graph users. When the threat comes from inside the social network itself, the threat is called an active attack, and the de-facto privacy measure used to quantify the resistance to such an attack is the $(k,\ell)$-anonymity. The original formulation of $(k,\ell)$-anonymity represents the adversary's knowledge as a vector of distances to the set of attacker nodes. In this article, we argue that such adversary is too strong when it comes to counteracting active attacks. We, instead, propose a new formulation where the adversary's knowledge is the multiset of distances to the set of attacker nodes. The goal of this article is to study the $(k,\ell)$-multiset anonymity from a graph theoretical point of view, while establishing its relationship to $(k,\ell)$-anonymity in one hand, and considering the $k$-multiset antiresolving sets as its theoretical frame, in a second one. That is, we prove properties of some graph families in relation to whether they contain a set of attacker nodes that breaks the $(k,\ell)$-multiset anonymity. From a practical point of view, we develop a linear programming formulation of the $k$-multiset antiresolving sets that allows us to calculate the resistance of social graphs against active attacks. This is useful for analysts who wish to know the level of privacy offered by a graph.

ArXiv.org
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.