A new theoretical Lorentzian Apodization function: A Simulations based Comparison with traditional Apodization functions

Standard apodization methods suppress side lobes but increase FWHM, reducing lateral resolution. Grating lobes can interfere with the main lobe, introducing artifacts in ultrasound images. A simple mathematical apodization function is needed to reduce side lobes while decreasing FWHM, thereby improving lateral resolution. The advantage of the new apodization function is that it performs comparably to the Hanning function in suppressing the first grating lobe while also reducing FWHM. This leads to improved lateral resolution and fewer artifacts caused by interference between side lobes and the main beam. Simulations using the new inverse quadratic apodization and no apodization were conducted with a wave pressure model. The new method was implemented using a rectangular function convoluted with the Fourier transform of an inverse quadratic. FWHM and the first side lobe amplitudes were quantified and compared across apodization functions. The inverse quadratic apodization outperformed no apodization in FWHM, with values of 0.906 mm and 1.22 mm, respectively. For first grating lobe suppression, the inverse quadratic and Hanning apodizations yielded -31.47 dB and -31 dB, respectively. Simulated B-mode wire phantom scans showed CNR values of 1.06 (no apodization), 1.32 (Hanning), and 1.66 (inverse quadratic). Corresponding image sharpness values were 7.3398, 6.6009, and 7.0039. The proposed apodization improves FWHM over rectangular and better suppresses the first side lobe than Hanning. Lorentzian apodization at a= 8, a= 15, the method yields superior CNR compared to standard apodizations, with only a slight trade-off in sharpness.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-04-06
Primary Topic
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new theoretical Lorentzian Apodization function: A Simulations based Comparison with traditional Apodization functions

ArXiv.org
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
article

A new theoretical Lorentzian Apodization function: A Simulations based Comparison with traditional Apodization functions

article en

Abstract

Standard apodization methods suppress side lobes but increase FWHM, reducing lateral resolution. Grating lobes can interfere with the main lobe, introducing artifacts in ultrasound images. A simple mathematical apodization function is needed to reduce side lobes while decreasing FWHM, thereby improving lateral resolution. The advantage of the new apodization function is that it performs comparably to the Hanning function in suppressing the first grating lobe while also reducing FWHM. This leads to improved lateral resolution and fewer artifacts caused by interference between side lobes and the main beam. Simulations using the new inverse quadratic apodization and no apodization were conducted with a wave pressure model. The new method was implemented using a rectangular function convoluted with the Fourier transform of an inverse quadratic. FWHM and the first side lobe amplitudes were quantified and compared across apodization functions. The inverse quadratic apodization outperformed no apodization in FWHM, with values of 0.906 mm and 1.22 mm, respectively. For first grating lobe suppression, the inverse quadratic and Hanning apodizations yielded -31.47 dB and -31 dB, respectively. Simulated B-mode wire phantom scans showed CNR values of 1.06 (no apodization), 1.32 (Hanning), and 1.66 (inverse quadratic). Corresponding image sharpness values were 7.3398, 6.6009, and 7.0039. The proposed apodization improves FWHM over rectangular and better suppresses the first side lobe than Hanning. Lorentzian apodization at a= 8, a= 15, the method yields superior CNR compared to standard apodizations, with only a slight trade-off in sharpness.

ArXiv.org
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.