AI Attitudes Among Marginalized Populations in the U.S.: Nonbinary, Transgender, and Disabled Individuals Report More Negative AI Attitudes

As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies become increasingly per- vasive, understanding public perceptions of AI is crucial for en- suring equitable adoption and impact. Attitudes toward AI, such as whether it is seen as helpful or harmful, may vary based on social identities and lived experiences. In this study, we conducted a survey (n = 742) including a representative U.S. sample and an oversample of gender minorities, racial minorities, and disabled individuals to examine how demographic factors shape AI attitudes. Our findings reveal that in the U.S. context, participants who are nonbinary, transgender, and/or women, and disabled participants, particularly those who are neurodivergent or have mental health conditions, report significantly more negative attitudes towards AI compared to majority groups. We argue that these disparities highlight a critical issue: negative AI attitudes among marginalized communities signals a continued failure to account for their needs and concerns in AI design and use. That marginalized Americans have more negative views towards AI should prompt reflection and critical examination of the prevalent rhetoric of AI’s purported inevitability and its framing as a universal social good.

Publication Details

Journal
University of Michigan Library
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7302/26061
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Attitudes Among Marginalized Populations in the U.S.: Nonbinary, Transgender, and Disabled Individuals Report More Negative AI Attitudes

University of Michigan Library
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI Attitudes Among Marginalized Populations in the U.S.: Nonbinary, Transgender, and Disabled Individuals Report More Negative AI Attitudes

article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies become increasingly per- vasive, understanding public perceptions of AI is crucial for en- suring equitable adoption and impact. Attitudes toward AI, such as whether it is seen as helpful or harmful, may vary based on social identities and lived experiences. In this study, we conducted a survey (n = 742) including a representative U.S. sample and an oversample of gender minorities, racial minorities, and disabled individuals to examine how demographic factors shape AI attitudes. Our findings reveal that in the U.S. context, participants who are nonbinary, transgender, and/or women, and disabled participants, particularly those who are neurodivergent or have mental health conditions, report significantly more negative attitudes towards AI compared to majority groups. We argue that these disparities highlight a critical issue: negative AI attitudes among marginalized communities signals a continued failure to account for their needs and concerns in AI design and use. That marginalized Americans have more negative views towards AI should prompt reflection and critical examination of the prevalent rhetoric of AI’s purported inevitability and its framing as a universal social good.

University of Michigan Library
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.