Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana)

In order to comprehensively evaluate the difference in fruit quality among 16 different feijoa lines, this study determined the external and internal quality indicators and antioxidant activities of 16 feijoa lines. Variability analysis, correlation analysis and principal component analysis were used to identify core indicators. The weights of these indicators were determined by analytic hierarchy process, and a comprehensive evaluation model for fruit quality was established by grey relational analysis. The accuracy of the model was verified by sensory evaluation. The results indicated a significant variation in fruit quality across feijoa lines. Four core fruit quality indexes were selected, including single fruit mass (X1), juice yield (X2), sugar/acid ratio (X3), and total phenol content (X4). The comprehensive evaluation model was described as follows: weighted grey relational grade = 0.381 0X1 + 0.298 2X2 + 0.210 8X3 + 0.110 0X4. The model results were correlated well with those of sensory evaluation (R2 = 0.869), indicating high accuracy of the model. Two excellent lines, Y4 and Y1, were selected for promotion. The findings provide a reference for the establishment of a comprehensive evaluation system for feijoa quality and offer scientific guidance for feijoa breeding.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20240716-161
Primary Topic
Psidium guajava Extracts and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana)

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Psidium guajava Extracts and Applications
article

Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana)

article en

Abstract

In order to comprehensively evaluate the difference in fruit quality among 16 different feijoa lines, this study determined the external and internal quality indicators and antioxidant activities of 16 feijoa lines. Variability analysis, correlation analysis and principal component analysis were used to identify core indicators. The weights of these indicators were determined by analytic hierarchy process, and a comprehensive evaluation model for fruit quality was established by grey relational analysis. The accuracy of the model was verified by sensory evaluation. The results indicated a significant variation in fruit quality across feijoa lines. Four core fruit quality indexes were selected, including single fruit mass (X1), juice yield (X2), sugar/acid ratio (X3), and total phenol content (X4). The comprehensive evaluation model was described as follows: weighted grey relational grade = 0.381 0X1 + 0.298 2X2 + 0.210 8X3 + 0.110 0X4. The model results were correlated well with those of sensory evaluation (R2 = 0.869), indicating high accuracy of the model. Two excellent lines, Y4 and Y1, were selected for promotion. The findings provide a reference for the establishment of a comprehensive evaluation system for feijoa quality and offer scientific guidance for feijoa breeding.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Southwest University (CN), Chongqing Technology and Business University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Psidium guajava Extracts and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fruit Quality Evaluation and Optimal Selection of 16 Lines of Feijoa (Acca sellowiana) · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS