Carrying the (paper) burden: A portfolio view of systemic risk and optimal bank size

In this paper we propose a two-level portfolio allocation optimization program and use it to explore the banking industry systemic risk management from a regulatory (supervisor) perspective. In our model banks choose their portfolio to maximize their own profits, while the supervisor optimizes the risk and return in the banking system as a whole. This may induce inefficiencies, leading to a banking system that produces excessive risk. We propose three policy scenarios based on current regulation practices and proposals and explore the ability of these regulatory regimes to reduce the systemic risk of the banking industry. We illustrate the use of the model by looking at over 9,000 US banks in the period 1984-2013, covering two major recessions. While all policy scenarios yield a better risk-return trade-off compared with the observed portfolio, the greatest improvements are achieved when the supervisor is able to limit the size of banks.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28547541.v1
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carrying the (paper) burden: A portfolio view of systemic risk and optimal bank size

Figshare
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Carrying the (paper) burden: A portfolio view of systemic risk and optimal bank size

article en

Abstract

In this paper we propose a two-level portfolio allocation optimization program and use it to explore the banking industry systemic risk management from a regulatory (supervisor) perspective. In our model banks choose their portfolio to maximize their own profits, while the supervisor optimizes the risk and return in the banking system as a whole. This may induce inefficiencies, leading to a banking system that produces excessive risk. We propose three policy scenarios based on current regulation practices and proposals and explore the ability of these regulatory regimes to reduce the systemic risk of the banking industry. We illustrate the use of the model by looking at over 9,000 US banks in the period 1984-2013, covering two major recessions. While all policy scenarios yield a better risk-return trade-off compared with the observed portfolio, the greatest improvements are achieved when the supervisor is able to limit the size of banks.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Carrying the (paper) burden: A portfolio view of systemic risk and optimal bank size · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS