A framework for load rating in-service reinforced concrete bridges without construction plans

The load rating assessment of in-service reinforced concrete bridges faces a significant challenge due to the absence of original construction plans. This lack of information makes it difficult to ensure the structural safety of aging bridges under current traffic loads. A framework is proposed to address this issue, presenting a four-level system that requires sequential increments of information to approximate the analysis and the actual structure’s behavior. The proposed workflow should be used before load testing the structure, and the sequential adoption of increasing levels of information may prevent the use of expensive and time-consuming tools; thus, this methodology aims to simplify the structural evaluation process. Ultimately, this workflow enables the structural safety assessment for a specific live load, illustrated by evaluating six bridges under the live loads of ten vehicles. As the level of information increases, so does the bridge’s safety, and reducing the level of information does not lead to unsafe analysis since lower levels are inherently conservative. Bridges designed according to dated standards have an extra hidden load-bearing capacity due to conservative assumptions embedded in their design. Finally, the illustrative application of the workflow proved to be easily adjustable, efficient, and reliable for assessing existing bridges.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-06-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29279918
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for load rating in-service reinforced concrete bridges without construction plans

Figshare
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
article

A framework for load rating in-service reinforced concrete bridges without construction plans

article en

Abstract

The load rating assessment of in-service reinforced concrete bridges faces a significant challenge due to the absence of original construction plans. This lack of information makes it difficult to ensure the structural safety of aging bridges under current traffic loads. A framework is proposed to address this issue, presenting a four-level system that requires sequential increments of information to approximate the analysis and the actual structure’s behavior. The proposed workflow should be used before load testing the structure, and the sequential adoption of increasing levels of information may prevent the use of expensive and time-consuming tools; thus, this methodology aims to simplify the structural evaluation process. Ultimately, this workflow enables the structural safety assessment for a specific live load, illustrated by evaluating six bridges under the live loads of ten vehicles. As the level of information increases, so does the bridge’s safety, and reducing the level of information does not lead to unsafe analysis since lower levels are inherently conservative. Bridges designed according to dated standards have an extra hidden load-bearing capacity due to conservative assumptions embedded in their design. Finally, the illustrative application of the workflow proved to be easily adjustable, efficient, and reliable for assessing existing bridges.

Figshare
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A framework for load rating in-service reinforced concrete bridges without construction plans · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS