Effects of Frequency and Distribution on Learning Minority Defaults

This study investigates the learning of default patterns in an artificial language, focusing on the interplay between frequency and phonological distribution. Human participants were trained on a system of plural suffixes, including a default that varied in frequency across conditions. Results showed that participants successfully generalized the default pattern, even when it was a minority suffix. Explicit learners, who verbalized rules, were more likely to rely on phonological distribution, while implicit learners tended to overgeneralize the most frequent suffix. To compare human learning with computational models, we tested a rule-based Minimum Generalization Learner (MGL) and an encoder-decoder (ED) neural network. MGL effectively captured minority defaults by representing them as a disjunction of specific rules, while the ED model struggled in the equal-frequency condition, highlighting potential limitations in its ability to abstract default patterns. These findings contribute to the debate between symbolic and connectionist models by showing that both distribution and rule discovery play key roles in learning default patterns. A follow-up study is underway to further explore human learners’ ability to generalize default suffixes to entirely novel contexts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/amphonology.3030
Primary Topic
Language and cultural evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Frequency and Distribution on Learning Minority Defaults

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Language and cultural evolution
article

Effects of Frequency and Distribution on Learning Minority Defaults

article en

Abstract

This study investigates the learning of default patterns in an artificial language, focusing on the interplay between frequency and phonological distribution. Human participants were trained on a system of plural suffixes, including a default that varied in frequency across conditions. Results showed that participants successfully generalized the default pattern, even when it was a minority suffix. Explicit learners, who verbalized rules, were more likely to rely on phonological distribution, while implicit learners tended to overgeneralize the most frequent suffix. To compare human learning with computational models, we tested a rule-based Minimum Generalization Learner (MGL) and an encoder-decoder (ED) neural network. MGL effectively captured minority defaults by representing them as a disjunction of specific rules, while the ED model struggled in the equal-frequency condition, highlighting potential limitations in its ability to abstract default patterns. These findings contribute to the debate between symbolic and connectionist models by showing that both distribution and rule discovery play key roles in learning default patterns. A follow-up study is underway to further explore human learners’ ability to generalize default suffixes to entirely novel contexts.

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Language and cultural evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.