Amnesties for Political Crimes: From Terrorism to Dissent

This report explores the complex role of amnesties in addressing political crimes. It analyses how this category of offences is applied to diverse activities ranging from participating in armed insurgencies to engaging in non-violent dissent in non-conflict settings. Drawing on a sample of 374 amnesties for political crimes that were enacted from 1990 to 2023, the report finds that contrary to observations drawing from extradition law that the political offence exception is disappearing, amnesties continue to be used within states to create exceptions in the application of criminal justice. The report argues that the expansion of the counter-terrorism framework, which has eroded protections for combatants contained in international humanitarian law, and the growing criminalization of dissent have both served to expand the repressive use of criminal law, which amnesties for political offences often seek to remedy. The report further analyses how the legality of amnesties for political crimes may depend the context in which the crimes were committed, the types of political offences covered by the amnesty, and how they intersect with the duty to prosecute international criminal and serious human rights violations and with human rights law protections for individual’s rights to freedom of expression, assembly, and political participation.

Publication Details

Journal
ERA
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7488/era/5489
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Amnesties for Political Crimes: From Terrorism to Dissent

ERA
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

Amnesties for Political Crimes: From Terrorism to Dissent

article en

Abstract

This report explores the complex role of amnesties in addressing political crimes. It analyses how this category of offences is applied to diverse activities ranging from participating in armed insurgencies to engaging in non-violent dissent in non-conflict settings. Drawing on a sample of 374 amnesties for political crimes that were enacted from 1990 to 2023, the report finds that contrary to observations drawing from extradition law that the political offence exception is disappearing, amnesties continue to be used within states to create exceptions in the application of criminal justice. The report argues that the expansion of the counter-terrorism framework, which has eroded protections for combatants contained in international humanitarian law, and the growing criminalization of dissent have both served to expand the repressive use of criminal law, which amnesties for political offences often seek to remedy. The report further analyses how the legality of amnesties for political crimes may depend the context in which the crimes were committed, the types of political offences covered by the amnesty, and how they intersect with the duty to prosecute international criminal and serious human rights violations and with human rights law protections for individual’s rights to freedom of expression, assembly, and political participation.

ERA
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.